Dayshift Werewolves and Weekend Writers: A Review of the 3 Day Novel Contest Genre

A slowly leaked secret of my life is that I am a 3 Day Novel Contest survivor. For those who don’t know, the 3DNC is a kind of literary boot camp, “the world’s most notorious literary marathon,” where each year for the last thirty-five hundreds of writers across the world chain themselves to their laptops and typewriters in order to hammer out a 100-page novel in a single weekend. And for each of the last three years I’ve retreated to my writing shrine in my basement during the Labour Day weekend and tried to close a narrative arc in 72 hours. I’ve been successful in finishing a novel each year, though I’ve never cracked that magical list of honourable mentions, those intrepid writers who scrape their way to the top of the literary slag pile

Those who have read some of the 3DNC winners know that there is a kind of genre to the contest. Most of the winners write tight, almost cryptic first-person narratives, often filled with brooding characters that walk the line between self-hatred and self-discovery. For example, The Videographer by Jason Rapczynski (2008) is the story of a porn cameraman working through his failed relationships and toying with alcoholism. It is a prime model of loser lit, where the protagonist can’t even be motivated enough to have dreams that he would then expect to be crushed. The story lures the reader into the tragicomedy of the narrator’s film-staged self-discovery, and epitomizes the 3DNC genre.

There are other great examples. In the Garden of Men by John Kupferschmidt (2007) is a beautifully crafted journal of political impotence in the face of totalitarian control. From the sterile station of his office cubicle, the protagonist rebels in a futile attempt at a paper-trail revolution. Although he is ultimately unable to save humanity, he himself becomes human in this almost accidental and completely haphazard rebellion. Without the same kind of redemption, The Convictions of Leonard McKinley is Brendan McLeod’s addictive 2006 novel about a young boy’s fixation on appeasing God. Leonard’s perversion, though, is not his complex battle with actual sexual temptation, but the mutilating, spiritually twisted self-loathing that emerges out of his guilt toward a hybridized quasi-Christian god. It is a disturbing and gripping comedy.

As I sketch out my 3DNC outline each spring, I promise myself I will try to write something that fits within the contest genre. I would like to win, after all, and collect all those royalties that mount into the dozens of dollars. In 2009 I wrote something that might fit the genre, but it was too close, too personal, and at 150 pages, far too brief for real character development. In 2011 I wrote something that is completely un-publishable—a fun idea I wanted to work through, but I knew had no market. I was certain I would not win, but the 3DNC was a great way to get the idea on paper. And in 2010 I typed out a young adult novel that is now in the editing phase with the goal of offering it for publication. This light, colourful preteen girl novel isn’t exactly 3DNC standard fare.

But I picked up a winning book recently that has made me appreciate that there is some breadth in the 3DNC genre. Dayshift Werewolf is a fantasy novel that shows the underbelly of the fairy world. Underwood’s strength is her character exploration. Dayshift Werewolf has a zombie fighting to understand her teenage son who clearly doesn’t get zombiism, an overly-sensitive Norwegian mountain gnome trying to defect to the American wild, a cat-collecting 3DNC winnerwitch manipulated by everyone around her, and a werewolf who prefers gardening to hunting man-flesh. Whether it is a demon bored with the satanic rat race, a monster trying to find his poetic voice, or a teenage Sasquatch struggling to understand why her body isn’t magazine-beautiful, Underwood captures our generation’s neuroses in the comedic confessions of illicit characters.

Even though Underwood’s speculative fiction stretches the 3DNC genre a bit, it still shares some elements with the other books I’ve read. The characters each tell their story in the first person—these are diary entries, the complex mental journeys of the characters. This book is funny, and while it isn’t as dark and tragic as the others, it does have a sweet sadness about it. Dayshift Werewolf is also, in a very real sense, loser lit, the stories of the underdog—or underwerewolf, if such a cliché exists in Underwood’s parallel world. I have experimented with writing the underdog story in the fantasy form, and relish the freedom that Underwood takes advantage of in telling her character’s stories.

One stark difference between Underwood’s book and the other 3DNC winners is that Dayshift Werewolf isn’t really a novel. There is no beginning, middle, and end. Instead, the characters are all connected by this one town, Stevens’ Ferry, a literal breeding ground of the undead and the weirdly magical, an isolated hamlet with progressive inclusive communities for the naturally grotesque and fantastically degenerate. When I say it isn’t a novel, I don’t mean that the volunteer 3DNC judges picked poorly. Dayshift Werewolf is a great choice, an entertaining and intelligent read. But it fits on the very edges of the novel genre, much like Vincent Lam’s Bloodletting & Miraculous Cures, a haunting collection of stories drawn together around nominally connected characters. They both read like novels, but are really six degrees of separation story collections. This feature makes Underwood’s work unique among 3DNC champions.

Despite the relatively narrow range of books I’ve encountered among 3 Day Novel Contest winners, I loved every one of them. And despite the fact that I love loser lit—I even write loser lit—and despite the fact that I would love to win someday, I probably will not write a strategically 3DNC-like book this year. In fact, I already know what I will write and have begun plotline and character sketching. My hope is that it will be connected enough to the 3DNC family of books to be considered, and well written enough to be judged on its own merits. Mostly, though, 3DNC is an opportunity to stretch my literary legs, to test out ideas, tease out characters, and actually finish something in a vocation where stories can sometimes go on forever.

About Brenton Dickieson

“A Pilgrim in Narnia” is a blog project in reading and talking about the work of C.S. Lewis, J.R.R. Tolkien, the Inklings, L.M. Montgomery, and the worlds they created. As a "Faith, Fantasy, and Fiction" blog, we cover topics like children’s literature, myths and mythology, fantasy, science fiction, speculative fiction, poetry, theology, cultural criticism, art and writing. This blog includes my thoughts as I read through my favourite writings and reflect on my own life and culture. In this sense, I am a Pilgrim in Narnia--or Middle Earth, or Fairyland, or Avonlea. I am often peeking inside of wardrobes, looking for magic bricks in urban alleys, or rooting through yard sale boxes for old rings. If something here captures your imagination, leave a comment, “like” a post, share with your friends, or sign up to receive Narnian Pilgrim posts in your email box. Brenton Dickieson (PhD, Chester) is a father, husband, friend, university lecturer, and freelance writer from Prince Edward Island, Canada. You can follow him: www.aPilgrimInNarnia.com Twitter (X) @BrentonDana Instagram @bdickieson Facebook @aPilgrimInNarnia
This entry was posted in Reviews and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

20 Responses to Dayshift Werewolves and Weekend Writers: A Review of the 3 Day Novel Contest Genre

  1. Joshua Duffy says:

    Never heard of this but it sounds pretty sweet. The Dayshift Werewolf story sounds pretty amusing.

  2. Wow, this is my first year, and I had no idea there was such a consistent structure to the winners. I’m certain I was too short to win, but I wrote something I am incredibly proud of and plan to publish it as an illustrated novel. Great insights!

    • There have been outside-the-box winners, and I haven’t read 2010 or 2011, so who knows, really. All of them, in last draft, are in that 100-150 page territory (I think). Dayshift Werewolf was quite short.
      You have a core creativity, so you may yet win.

  3. Pingback: The Many Names of The Great Divorce: Finding that Elusive Title | A Pilgrim in Narnia

  4. Pingback: Prewriting for NaNoWriMo | A Pilgrim in Narnia

  5. Pingback: A Peak Around the Corner: My NaNoWriMo Reflections | A Pilgrim in Narnia

  6. Marion says:

    Just came across this as I sit here waiting (and waiting, and waiting). I’ve entered 4 times, but never thought about the “genre” other than quirky and not what I’m writing. I didn’t realize they usually pick 1st person stories.. This year’s entry is 1st person! Yay! Maybe I have a shot. The only other entry I had that was 1st person made the honor roll, so you probably are on to something.

    • I know! We are waiting forever, aren’t we. It is a lot of work, I know, and volunteer.
      I haven’t read all of the books, but there is a general genre, I think. You made the honour roll! That’s huge. I haven’t come close, and don’t think this is the year either. We’ll see (sooner or later!).

  7. Pingback: A Preview of my 2013 Three Day Novel Contest Story | A Pilgrim in Narnia

  8. Pingback: Some Reflections on my 3 Day Novel Experience | A Pilgrim in Narnia

  9. pam says:

    Hey Brenton – I too liked Dayshift Werewolf – and the …. oh man… I forget the title… the book that has TWO winners in it. Loved that they were so different. Though… yeah… I see what you mean about the winners mostly fitting a certain mold. Hmmm…

    Are you playing along with us this year?

    • Hey Pam, thanks for the note!
      I do think there is a rhythm of winners, though I haven’t read the last two. Once again, I am doing something from a genre that has never won: pre-teen/middle grade boys’ goofy humour “ah that’s nice” book.
      But I have been challenged on the Honour Roll (which I have not cracked)–there is more diversity there, perhaps.
      So, yes I am in! I’ll tag you on twitter.

      • pam says:

        Cool.

        I’m still plotless for this year, but I know something will come. Always does.

        Last year I was pretty plotless at this stage too. I was actually pretty plotless the whole way through the weekend 🙂

        Sure was fun though.

        • Plot isn’t my biggest worry. I usually have the first part, until a bend in the road anyway. The tension can be a problem–the tension point in the story I mean. Characters need to be bood.

  10. Marion says:

    The better-half won this year on his first try. (Also his first attempt at fiction.) Fortunately, I didn’t enter this year so so I don’t have to kill him. Yes, like many previous winners, Traversing Leonard is 1st person! I would also describe it as having a “sad sweetness.” And it’s effing brilliant. But what do I know? I’m only the wife.

    • pam says:

      “sad sweetness” I love that. Send him my congrats. I look forward to reading it!

    • That’s a pretty cool story! I would be tempted to kill my partner, even if I hadn’t thrown down.
      I’ve always wanted to write a blog about how I pretend (to myself) I’m just in 3DNC for fun but how I have to admit (to myself) that I’m sad when I don’t place. But I haven’t quite found the words.
      I have to catch up on my 3DNC reading!

      • Marion says:

        Just saw this reply going through my email. Our marriage has survived. Probably because I didn’t enter the year he won. The good news for you is if you entered this year, he won’t be competing. He didn’t finish his entry. So the field is clear. Good luck.

        • I love that story, and am glad I’m not competing with your partner. I’m not sure this is a winner, but it is kind of a fun kids story. One edit this winter, then I’ll slide it out to some beta readers (i.e., my son’s classmates).

  11. Pingback: The Charm of Mystery: An Encouragement to Christian Teachers in Secular Schools | A Pilgrim in Narnia

Leave a Reply