For today’s Friday Feature I’d like to share the Wade Center blog for this month, highlighting a book that I really, really should write more about. Each time I reread Till We Have Faces it is richer than the last.
Get Pilgrim Posts in Your Inbox
Join 5,291 other subscribersConnect & Follow!
Like us on Facebook
-
Recent Posts
- The New York C.S. Lewis Society Student Essay Contest
- Shadowy Steps through Hellish Fog: Amy Baik Lee’s Refreshing Invitation in This Homeward Ache
- C.S. Lewis and the Total Eclipse of the Heavens, with An Unauthorized Book-Jacket Description of The Great Divorce
- “The Hateful Feeling of Breathlessness I Have Had for Years”: A Personal Note on the One-Thing-After-Anotherness of Life
- Wyrdhoard Workshop #1: Layering Significance (Writing Workshop Announcement)
- A Brace of Tolkien Posts for his 132nd Birthday (#TolkienBirthdayToast)
- 2023: My Year in Books: The Infographic
- C.S. Lewis’ Christmas Sermon for Pagans in the Strand
Most Popular Posts
Archives
- April 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- March 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
Tags
- Anne of Green Gables
- art
- books
- C.S. Lewis
- Charles Williams
- children's literature
- Collected Letters of C.S. Lewis
- Death
- Dorothy L. Sayers
- fantasy
- film adaptation
- George MacDonald
- Harry Potter
- Inklings
- J.K. Rowling
- J.R.R. Tolkien
- Joy Davidman
- L.M. Montgomery
- letters
- lion the witch and the wardrobe
- literature
- Lord of the Rings
- Lucy Maud Montgomery
- Madeleine L'Engle
- myth
- Narnia
- On Writing
- owen barfield
- Oxford
- Peter Jackson
- Poetry
- Prince Edward Island
- Ransom Trilogy
- Reading
- research
- Science Fiction
- Signum University
- Stephen King
- Surprised by Joy
- Teaching
- That Hideous Strength
- The Great Divorce
- The Hobbit
- theology
- Theology of Culture
- The Screwtape Letters
- Walter Hooper
- writing
- WWI
- WWII
Meta
Categories
- 10 Minute Book Talk
- 5 Books Series
- Blogging the Hugos
- Canadian literature
- Creative Writing
- Feature Friday
- Fictional Worlds
- Guest Blogs
- Inklings and Arthur
- L.M. Montgomery
- Letters
- Lewis Biography
- Lewis' Essays
- Memorable Quotes
- News & Links
- On Writing
- Original Research
- Reflections
- Reviews
- Studies in Words
- The C.S. Lewis Studies Series
- The MaudCast
- Thoughtful Essays
- Throwback Thursdays
Goodreads
Blog Stats
- 1,965,554 visitors to A Pilgrim in Narnia
TWHF is a major 20th-century British novel and might be better recognized as such if someone else had written it. As it is, Lewis’s fame as scholar, as writer of children’s books, as Christian apologist, and so on — though well-deserved — probably comes between some prospective readers and this book. I included it for many years in my teaching, it and would go over well, although it’s a book that needs to be re-read, and my students were first-time readers of it.
Dale Nelson
I am curious about your theory, that if someone else wrote it there would be less resistance. You could well be right on that point, and I think on two fronts. One is that of genre fiction writing and the quality critics expect. The other is the idea of Christian “allegory.”
My undergrad students seem to do okay, but I think that it really is a better re-read and I’d love to have a group of second-time-around readers to go through it with.
Not to go too far away from TWHF (so blame me, if subsequent discussion does) — but this point about TWHF being a major British novel connects with the old Kathryn Lindskoog controversy. I now think that Mrs. Lindskoog was wrong about “The Dark Tower” and about some of the ways in which she conducted her campaign to force the issue of tamperings with Lewis’s writings. But I remember supporting her publicly, arguing that we have here the canon of a major British author, about which some serious allegations have been made; I’d suggest that if, say, comparable allegations were being made about George Orwells’s writings, everyone would see that, yes, we need to have a serious, impartial, scholarly investigation made, to settle as definitively as possible the textual questions. THAT was the main thing and not whether or not Walter Hooper had done wrong. But it was as if Lewis wasn’t really a major British author in a class with Orwell, or, say, Virginia Woolf or Graham Greene. But at the very least a case can be made that he was and is, and in the forefront of the case to be made for his having made a major contribution to mid-century British literature would be TWHF. Instead it seems to languish as a book that even a lot of people who think of themselves as Lewis fans haven’t read, and it gets dismissive remarks from, say, the Zaleskis in The Fellowship, their Inklings book. I wish that a bunch of people who concern themselves with the mid-century British novel (rather than specifically with Christian themes, or with fantasy, or with the Inklings, etc.) could read it without a lot of preconceptions, and then that we could hear from them about it. Is the first-person female narrator literarily effective? I remember a traditional Roman Catholic mother of my acquaintance expressing the few that this narrator is a failure, but I’m not sure exactly why. What about the family dynamics in the story? There seems to be quite a bit of interest in “dysfunctional families” these days, so what about this one? I am no admirer of most of what gets classified as “feminist,” but is it too much to hope for that there could be productive discussion of the treatment of Orual’s succeeding to her father’s throne? There are many interesting matters here for consideration after a reading of the novel, but it needs to be read through first.
Dale Nelson
There is a lot here. Yes, TWHF is an interesting novel to consider from a feminist perspective for a mid-century male British novel. The novel is literarily interesting on quite a few fronts. I don’t remember dismissive remarks, but when i hear glowing remarks or dismissive criticism I tend to ask for evidence, for people to explain their thoughts. I just don’t remember these ones, but I can see why TWHF would grate some people’s nerves, or disappoint many who look for fantasy from their author.
As far as status, I don’t know how to judge that. When he died, he wasn’t as important as most in the Bloomsbury set or even Grahame Green or George Orwell. Over time, though, George Orwell, Lewis, and F. Scott Fitzgerald have increased in status, while others have softened. In 1977 when Lindskoog began her conversation, Lewis was an interesting apologist and pretty good Narnia writer. 40 years later he is a leading 20th century figure.
I do think if there was a Tolkien manuscript controversy or Orwell plagiarism controversy, there would be a strong response today. But in 1977? Dunno.
These things are viral. And, let’s be honest, 80% of the posthumous growth of an author is about movies. Orwell’s films are not terribly popular, and the Bloomsbury set haven’t created great film (with a couple of great exceptions). But, boy, Narnia, Middle-earth, Harry Potter, George Martin…. fantasy works on film.
And so the literary vote buoys by the popular visual fan class.
What will happen with Narnia on Netflix? I don’t know, but it will make the books sell better.
Here are the Zaleskis:
“It is the most controversial of Lewis’s fictions, intensely disliked by many of his readers, extravagantly [sic] praised by a few, an anomaly among his works with its female narrator, its bleak landscapes, its bitter, ironic tone – more than a few passages might have come from Camus or Sartre – its complex plot, its cultivated obscurities, and its uncertain conclusion. …the book’s presiding darkness and relentless melancholy make it a struggle to read and nearly impossible to cherish. …Even T. H. White – a writer deeply sympathetic to modern retellings of ancient myth – caviled over Lewis’s ‘mumbo-jumbo.’ Till We Have Faces remains, for all its brilliances, the Lewis novel most readers turn to last and slog through with grudging admiration.” The Fellowship, pp. 449-450
I won’t take the time to spell out objections to each of the (at best) questionable statements that accumulate here. The opening sentence is a statistical one offered without support. Why the praise of the “few” is “extravagant” is not explained. They end with more dubious statistics (“most readers” turn to TWHF last and find it a slog, etc.).
That’s what I meant about them dismissing TWHF.
Dale Nelson
Yes, I think that could be rewritten, certainly.
I must get around to reading TWHF. I haven’t because I tend to agree with Tolkien about allegory, and the main premise of the book seems to be that individuality didn’t exist prior to Christianity (or something) — but the book does sound interesting.
Allegory? I’d say that TWHF is perhaps the most novelistic of Lewis’s books, replete with sensory details, the examination of motive (by a fallible narrator), the evocation not of a timeless realm but of a well-realized (though imagined) time and place in our world, etc.
Have you read Henry James’s The Turn of the Screw? TWHF has some affinity with that novella, but as if Lewis was concerned not with evil so much as with holiness. But the governess (who is not insane and is not hallucinating ghosts) and Orual have some interesting similarities.
Dale Nelson
I wrote awkwardly just now in that I seem to be implying that an allegory will lack sensory details. Of course that’s not necessarily the case. I suppose what I was getting at is that the book contains plenty of sensory details intended to evoke objective scenes that build up Glome, etc. in the reader’s mind as a “real” tiny kingdom of the ancient world.
DN
I haven’t read Turn of the Screw because I don’t do horror (I’m scared by 1930s horror films with obviously fake rubber bats).
But you’ve convinced me to read TWHF 🙂
Oh, funny. I enjoy horror and have been truly frightened by few of them. But TWHF has a nice play of light and dark moments without actually being frightening.
Oh, and there aren’t any allegorical moments in TWHF, though Lewis plays with divine figures, the elements and landscape.
I will admit that I haven’t read TWHF yet. I think I got scared off by the whole “retelling of the Psyche myth” thing and thought it might be above me. But everything I read about it tells me that I do need to give it a try. Hopefully next year!
I’ve read TWHF nine times, most of those times being in connection with my teaching at a state university. It was one of the books in a course on the British Novel. The course met once a week on Monday evenings and we’d spend two weeks on it. I prepared a list of proposed pronunciations and major concerns to help students. Some readers may be put off by unfamiliar names, or, if reading fantasy, by names that depart from certain “templates.” Having a list of names in itself could help first-time readers.
The novel held up very well.
DN
You could do a year of reading books you’ve avoided!
Pingback: The Shape of the Cross in C.S. Lewis’ Writing: My Oct 23rd Talk at the Oxford C.S. Lewis Society | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: What Counts as An Old Book? A Conversation with C.S. Lewis and Goodreads | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: The Tolkien Letters that Changed C.S. Lewis’ Life (On Tolkien’s Birthday) | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: 2018: A Year of Reading: The Nerd Bit | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: Alan Jacobs’ Experiment in 1943: Christian Intellectual Foundations with Lewis, Maritain, Auden, Eliot, and Weil | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: Literary Diversity and the Bottomless C.S. Lewis: A Unique Journey in Books | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: 7 New Audiobooks on C.S. Lewis: Michael Ward, James Como, Stephanie Derrick, Joe Rigney, Diana Glyer, Gary Selby | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: I Passed my Viva! | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: An Open Class on Narnia and Friendship with Brenton Dickieson, Jason Lepojärvi, and Diana Pavlac Glyer | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: “A Sense of the Season”: C.S. Lewis’ Birthday Pivot and the Cambridge Inaugural Address | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: An Open Class on Narnia and Friendship with Brenton Dickieson, Jason Lepojärvi, and Diana Pavlac Glyer (Full Video from Signum University) | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: More Relevant Than Ever: Why the Wade Center Authors Like Lewis and Tolkien Still Matter (Friday Feature) | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: 2019: A Year of Reading: The Nerd Bit, with Charts | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: It is Easy to Teach C.S. Lewis’ “Till We Have Faces,” but It’s Hard to Blog About It | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: The “Pints with Jack” Podcast on Till We Have Faces @pintswithjack | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: “A Sense of the Season”: C.S. Lewis’ Birthday Pivot and the Cambridge Inaugural Address | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: The Top New Posts of 2020 on A Pilgrim in Narnia | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: 2020: A Year of Reading: The Nerd Bit, with Charts | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: Good C.S. Lewis Studies Books That Did Not Win the Mythopoeic Award: Part 1: C.S. Lewis on Theology, Philosophy, and Spiritual Life | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: Good C.S. Lewis Studies Books That Did Not Win the Mythopoeic Award: Part 2: C.S. Lewis Biographies | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: “A Sense of the Season”: C.S. Lewis’ Birthday Pivot and the Cambridge Inaugural Address (Updated) | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: “A Sense of the Season”: C.S. Lewis’ Birthday Pivot and the Cambridge Inaugural Address (Updated 2022) | A Pilgrim in Narnia