Bandersnatch and Creative Collaboration by Diana Pavlac Glyer

old-typewriterI am a rapid writer, someone who works in fits and starts. I benefit from binges of work, closeted away to get down what’s been rolling around my chest for hours or days. It took a decade for me to figure this out—and another half-decade to be okay with it—but I know how I work best.

Still, even when my confidence is highest, I admire that slow and steady scholar, the artist who paints leaf by leaf, the writer who writes bird by bird.

Diana Pavlac Glyer is one of the latter kind of wordsmiths. I don’t know how long her The Company They Keep took to write from concept to cover, but it was at least a couple of decades. The painstaking investment of time, the careful scouring of archives and texts over years and years led to one of those rare scholarly achievements: a book that changes the way we think about the authors we love to read. A lot of the work I do is in dialogue with Glyer’s—including the work I did before I read The Company They Keep.

the-company-they-keep-diana-pavlac-glyerNow, seven years after releasing her award-winning The Company They Keep in 2009, Glyer has taken the core ideas and original research for scholars and found a way to share it with everyone. The result is Bandernatch: C.S. Lewis, J.R.R. Tolkien, and the Creative Collaboration of the Inklings.

This intriguing little book restates the central argument of her previous work. Glyer argues that the Inklings were not original geniuses who worked alone to create books that changed the shape of fantasy literature. Instead, they were subcreators with flexible and expansive imaginations who worked together as critics, encouragers, and co-creators. We have Narnia and Middle Earth because the Inklings were there for each other, providing support from the moment of a story’s inception to the creation of their friend’s legacy, at every step of the creative process

Glyer does not merely restate the arguments from The Company They Keep, but creates in Bandersnatch a resource not only to understand what the Inklings did, but to reproduce the experiment in our own hometowns and online chat groups. This happens not just in handy little dialogue boxes like “Doing What the Inklings Did,” but in focusing biographies and stories toward the creative process. Moreover, Glyer models collaborative creation by speaking throughout Bandersnatch of the ways she received and gave help in the years the book came together.

bandersnatch-lewis-tolkien-diana-pavlac-glyerWho is this book for? Besides the normal curious reader, I think any of these four groups will enjoy Bandersnatch and receive something important from the book.

  1. Fans of C.S. Lewis, J.R.R. Tolkien, and the Inklings: If you love the Inklings you will relish the insider look you get of how these creative minds made the worlds we love. Bandersnatch moves us past to the biographies to the interior processes of Lewis, Tolkien, and their friends.
  2. Writers and Artists: Key indicators of this book are that it is inexpensive and yet beautifully done. Glyer is an artisan, a craftswoman, and she wants to draw other creative souls in to the liberating power of shared experience. Writers don’t have to work alone—and, if Glyer is right about the Inklings, most of them shouldn’t even try.
  3. Emerging and Young Scholars: If you are just beginning to do your work on Lewis and Tolkien—or to think in new ways about the creative process and intertextuality—this is a good book to get you established. Glyer leaves enough trails for your to find your way to her dialogue partners, and ultimately to her scholarly work.
  4. Readers of The Company They Keep: Academic texts are not always great texts for rereading. Though I found her first book pretty accessible, Bandersnatch is like the bedside table version. If you are looking to update your reading and recover the train of her arguments, Bandersnatch is a great way to get back in to the discussion.

bandersnatch-by-james-artimus-owenI have provided a glowing review here. I am fan of Glyer’s work, to the point that I was a Kickstarter investor in the audiobook of Bandersnatch. But are there any weaknesses in the text?

Inevitably there are. Occasionally, Glyer presses her point more than the casual reader will need. We must remember, though, that she is responding to deeply entrenched critical schools. Glyer applies a respectful but powerful critique of the otherwise invaluable work of Humphrey Carpenter (biographer of Tolkien and the Inklings) and Walter Hooper (literary curator of C.S. Lewis’ work). On the critical thesis at the centre of her work—that Lewis and Tolkien were not lone geniuses but men working within complex networks of influence and support—Glyer feels the need to establish her claim fully. I suspect most readers of Bandersnatch are willing to go with her, and are simply pleased to dispel with the myth of the solo writer before the bright screen or blank page.

diana-pavlac-glyerMy other criticism is that the book is too short. I may not be the best judge of this since I relished in the detail of her academic work, but I would have loved more examples and stories from the Inklings. I know there is wisdom in brevity and leaving the reader wanting more. Still, it is a trend in publishing that I would like to resist a little bit.

You can see that I am stretching to find something critical to say. Really, I think this is a book you should invest in—the beautiful softcover out now, or the audiobook soon to be released featuring the voice of C.S. Lewis scholar, Michael Ward. It isn’t just that you’ll benefit as a reader, but you can see how this review itself is a kind of performance of the book, that this review is part of the process of creative collaboration. This is one of the genius aspects of blogging. Writers are always trading manuscripts and scratching notes in margins.  It is in social media worlds like this that we can be the kinds of “resonators” that the Inklings were for one another.

Pretty clever, actually.


About Brenton Dickieson

“A Pilgrim in Narnia” is a blog project in reading and talking about the work of C.S. Lewis, J.R.R. Tolkien, and the worlds they touched. As a "Faith, Fantasy, and Fiction" blog, we cover topics like children’s literature, apologetics and philosophy, myths and mythology, fantasy, theology, cultural critique, art and writing. This blog includes my thoughts as I read through Lewis and Tolkien and reflect on my own life and culture. In this sense, I am a Pilgrim in Narnia--or Middle Earth, or Fairyland. I am often peeking inside of wardrobes, looking for magic bricks in urban alleys, or rooting through yard sale boxes for old rings. If something here captures your imagination, leave a comment, “like” a post, share with your friends, or sign up to receive Narnian Pilgrim posts in your email box. Brenton Dickieson is a father, husband, friend, university lecturer, and freelance writer from Prince Edward Island, Canada. You can follow him on Twitter, @BrentonDana.
This entry was posted in Reviews and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

48 Responses to Bandersnatch and Creative Collaboration by Diana Pavlac Glyer

  1. Reblogged this on The Oddest Inkling and commented:
    Here is an excellent, glowing review by Brenton Dickieson of Diana Glyer’s awesome book “Bandersnatch.” I love this book so much, I have a Bandersnatch hanging from my keychain to remind me to work with others! I’m giving a talk on collaboration at this upcoming conference: Enjoy Brenton’s post!

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Pingback: Bandersnatch! | Ekphrasis: Allentown's Fellowship of Christians in the Arts

  3. L.A. Smith says:

    Ooo! I have seen this book a time or two on my travels throughout the web, and have been intrigued by it. But your review has sealed the deal – I will definitely get this one. Looking forward to reading it! Thanks!

    Liked by 2 people

  4. Read it, and it was splendid!

    Liked by 3 people

  5. wanderwolf says:

    Ooh! (And I see, I’m the second to write that) I have to go on Amazon now…
    small note, in your list of who would be interested, you write “shouldn’t” at one point where you may have meant “didn’t”
    I debated if I should point it out… I’m not nitpicky! But I thought maybe you’d want to change it…

    Liked by 2 people

  6. For me this is the best kind of review, the one that says to me that I cannot afford NOT to read this book!
    PS The double negative was a necessity there!

    Liked by 1 person

  7. Pingback: Bandersnatch and Creative Collaboration by Diana Pavlac Glyer — A Pilgrim in Narnia |

  8. David Llewellyn Dodds says:

    Having in my desultory way not yet caught up with either, as keenly attractive as they sound, I wondered: any recommendations about which to read first, now they are both there?


    • Well, Bandersnatch is a 6 hour read and Company a 12 hour read, so that’s a factor. Bandersnatch is by the bed, Company by the reading chair.
      But, for you, definitely the academic one.


      • David Llewellyn Dodds says:

        Thanks! (That has the added interest of following their times of coming to be, like your chronological reading of Lewis.)

        Liked by 1 person

      • Hannah says:

        Company only a 12 hour read? You must be a very fast reader or me a very slow one. It took me a nice summer month … and inspired me to at last find the title of my webside. Doing a course towards setting it up I discovered something in the 2010 theme …


  9. Pingback: Bandersnatch and Creative Collaboration by Diana Pavlac Glyer — A Pilgrim in Narnia –

  10. Pingback: Some Friday Feature C.S. Lewis Notes | A Pilgrim in Narnia

  11. Pingback: 2016: A Year of Reading | A Pilgrim in Narnia

  12. Pingback: A Brace of Tolkien Posts (125th Birthday Week) | A Pilgrim in Narnia

  13. Pingback: A Brace of Tolkien Posts #TolkienReadingDay | A Pilgrim in Narnia

  14. Pingback: 2017 Mythopoeic Awards Finalists and A Review of “The Chapel of the Thorn” by Charles Williams | A Pilgrim in Narnia

  15. Pingback: A Brace of Tolkien Posts for his 126th Birthday #TolkienBirthdayToast | A Pilgrim in Narnia

  16. Pingback: My Cheat Sheet of C.S. Lewis’ Writing Schedule | A Pilgrim in Narnia

  17. Pingback: In an Age of Literary Groups, L.M. Montgomery was Alone (L.M. Montgomery Series) #LMMI2018 | A Pilgrim in Narnia

  18. Pingback: Why the C.S. Lewis and Friends Colloquium is Awesome: The Bit About Students | A Pilgrim in Narnia

  19. Pingback: Here Be Dragons: Mythmoot VI Launch and Call For Papers (Friday Feature) | A Pilgrim in Narnia

  20. Pingback: My Discussion with Diana Glyer about the Tolkien Biopi on William O’Flaherty’s All About Jack Podcast | A Pilgrim in Narnia

  21. Pingback: 7 New Audiobooks on C.S. Lewis: Michael Ward, James Como, Stephanie Derrick, Joe Rigney, Diana Glyer, Gary Selby | A Pilgrim in Narnia

  22. Pingback: C.S. Lewis, Sexology, and the OED | A Pilgrim in Narnia

  23. Pingback: An Open Class on Narnia and Friendship with Brenton Dickieson, Jason Lepojärvi, and Diana Pavlac Glyer | A Pilgrim in Narnia

  24. Pingback: An Open Class on Narnia and Friendship with Brenton Dickieson, Jason Lepojärvi, and Diana Pavlac Glyer (Full Video from Signum University) | A Pilgrim in Narnia

  25. Pingback: Mythopoeic Awards 2020: Call for Nominations (Friday Feature) | A Pilgrim in Narnia

  26. Pingback: 2019: A Year of Reading: The Nerd Bit, with Charts | A Pilgrim in Narnia

  27. Pingback: A Brace of Tolkien Posts for his 128th Birthday #TolkienBirthdayToast | A Pilgrim in Narnia

  28. Pingback: The Tolkien And Lewis Bromance: The Diana Glyer Interview on the Babylon Bee | A Pilgrim in Narnia

  29. Pingback: A Brace of Tolkien Posts for his 129th Birthday #TolkienBirthdayToast | A Pilgrim in Narnia

  30. Pingback: Why is Tolkien Scholarship Stronger than Lewis Scholarship? Part 1: Creative Breaks that Inspired Tolkien Readers | A Pilgrim in Narnia

  31. Pingback: Tolkien Studies Projects Sweeps the Mythopoeic Scholarship Award Shortlist in Inklings Studies (Trying Not To Say “I Told You So”) | A Pilgrim in Narnia

  32. Pingback: Marsha Daigle-Williamson’s Reflecting the Eternal and Dante in the Work of C.S. Lewis, with Thoughts about Intertextuality (Good C.S. Lewis Studies Books That Did Not Win the Mythopoeic Award Series Insert) | A Pilgrim in Narnia

  33. Pingback: Good C.S. Lewis Studies Books That Did Not Win the Mythopoeic Award: Part 3: Literary Studies on C.S. Lewis | A Pilgrim in Narnia

  34. Pingback: The C.S. Lewis Studies Series: Part 5: Recent and Foundational Studies on Lewis and Gender | A Pilgrim in Narnia

  35. Pingback: The C.S. Lewis Studies Series: Where It’s Going and How You Can Contribute | A Pilgrim in Narnia

  36. Pingback: “Imaginative Hospitality” A C.S. Lewis & Kindred Spirits Society “Connected” Event Hosted by Kirstin Jeffrey Johnson with Diana Glyer, Michael Ward, and Fr. Andrew Cuneo (Mon, Nov 1st, 12noon EST on Zoom) | A Pilgrim in Narnia

  37. Pingback: The Doom and Destiny of Tolkien’s Chaucer Research: A Note on John M. Bowers, Tolkien’s Lost Chaucer (2019) | A Pilgrim in Narnia

  38. Pingback: “Imaginative Hospitality” A C.S. Lewis & Kindred Spirits Society “Connected” Event Hosted by Kirstin Jeffrey Johnson with Diana Glyer, Michael Ward, and Fr. Andrew Cuneo (Full Video) | A Pilgrim in Narnia

  39. Pingback: Announcing my New C.S. Lewis Course at the University of Prince Edward Island (Registration Open for January 2022) | A Pilgrim in Narnia

  40. Pingback: A Brace of Tolkien Posts for his 130th Birthday (#TolkienBirthdayToast) | A Pilgrim in Narnia

  41. Pingback: A Brace of Tolkien Posts for his 131st Birthday (#TolkienBirthdayToast) | A Pilgrim in Narnia

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.