Why I Chose not to Perform at Trump’s Inauguration

After deep consideration and advice from my friends and family, I have decided to join the growing list of those who have chosen not to perform at Trump’s Inauguration on Friday. That includes A-list celebs like Kanye West, Céline Dion, David Foster, Ice-T, Justin Timberlake, Bruno Mars, Katy Perry, and Aretha Franklin. Even Kiss was invited, though Gene Simmons declined—which makes me sad. I think the symbol of four aged performers with too much make-up and all their best work behind them would make an interesting symbolic moment on America’s stage.

Unfortunately, “I Was Made For Lovin’ You” was not written for Donald Trump. Kiss won’t be rock and rolling all night on Friday. For Gene Simmons and artists like him, supporting Trump is a deuce of a problem.

Even getting a DJ is tough. It was rumored that The Chainsmokers were going to do it, but it was just a Twitter joke. Moby—do you remember Moby?—well he offered to DJ if he could play Green Day’s “American Idiot.” It doesn’t look like it will work out.

Not everyone pulled out because they were anti-Trump or offended by his ideas about race, gender, sexuality, political allegiances, immigration policy, fiscal management, employee relations, foreign relations, spirituality, how to respond to criticism, or how women are designed to serve his personal needs. Sometimes the world’s leading stars were just busy or not interested.

Trump sent a nice note when Elton John was joined in civil partnership with David Furnish, so there is no bad blood there. Sir Elton just didn’t want to be involved in the American political scene and suggested they just get one of those “one of those [expletive] country stars. They’ll do it for you.” Not Charlotte Church, though. She said his team should have done their research better.

Paul Anka is a long-term friend of Trump, and would even have rewritten the words to “My Way” for the occasion. Unfortunately, someone took his “Having My Baby” too seriously and he is in a custody battle that day. It’s too bad. I was hoping he would do that killer cover of “Smells Like Teen Spirit.” Again, for symbolic value.

I understand how difficult these choices are. When you disagree critically with something or someone, the hardest thing is to decide when to engage and remain in the space of influence, and when to step out altogether.

There is no institution that is free of taint. Choosing to remain in your political party, church, school, office, partnership, knitting circle, or home and school association means negotiating a complex series of compromises that seems designed to take the heart out of all our choices. I get how painful these decisions are: it is the same for the student and the street performer as it is for the pop star and the politician.

Regardless of who ended up being elected in November, each American was going to have to go through another cycle of taking the bad with what seems like an ever diminishing good. Each Christian, feminist, activist, educator, refugee, writer, factory worker, and tap-dance shoe designer would spend the months and years of the winning team’s administration trying to justify the way they engage in public life. Until the world’s leaders are women and men of breathtaking integrity and vision, this is what it means to be a citizen.

So this is why even though I am disappointed in the artists who backed down after public pressure, I understand what they went through. For the first time they were faced in most certain terms with what the little moral choices they make each day really mean. No one ever told them before that ­­our character is formed by the little decisions we make in the dark, not just the big decisions we make in the limelight.

Though I don’t understand why there are church choirs and leggy women dancing in a line at a Presidential inauguration, I admire the choir member or Rockette who steps off the stage—and maybe loses his or her career—because of what they believe. It is hard to admire the superstar who backs down after signing a contract because they realize they are now hated by a whole bunch of people with twitter accounts. If the strengths of our convictions are not enough to withstand public outrage—and how the public loves to be outraged these days!— we did not really have convictions that were worth standing up for.

But I suspect no one has ever told them that this is what it means to be a moral person. My decision whether or not to perform is the same whether the public will be pleased or outraged.

I was tempted to perform at the inauguration just because I was turned off by the morally gutless late exits by some people who suddenly grew a conscience. I was also tempted because of the public hypocrisy of moral outrage. There will be thousands of support workers at the inauguration, including line cooks, security guards, intelligence workers, President Obama’s staff, janitors, water boys, and journalists. If problematic engagement is wrong, where is the moral outrage against these support workers? It is clear we have a disturbed relationship with our celebrities.

And I was tempted to perform because of the strange reaction of liberals, progressives, and true conservatives who are protesting this President. Yes, you should hold him to account. Even if he has asbestos in his soles, if you do not hold his feet to the fire you are betraying your community. But he was America’s free choice, for better or worse. He has earned the right to be on that stage with hot acts like 3 Doors Down, a Bruce Springsteen cover band, and half the Rockettes (all the women of color and their supporters backed out).

Still, despite all the good jerky reasons to perform, I am choosing not to go to Washington on Friday.

I am not opting out because Trump is conservative. He’s not conservative in all the deepest ways, but even if he was that would not affect my decision. And it is not because Trump is Republican. I don’t think he is Republican either, but a partisan choice for me is not necessarily a moral one. And it is not because he is part of the 1%. America’s political system is for the elite; Donald Trump simply understood how that would work better than some. Presidents have been elite since I was a child. This is what Americans keep choosing. It would be hypocrisy to pretend otherwise.

No, my reason for not performing is much simpler: there isn’t enough money on the table. The offer isn’t big enough. When rejecting what has to be one of the weirdest invitations Trump’s team issued—to the women who sang “Not Ready to Make Nice” about President Bush—Dixie Chicks manager Simon Renshaw quipped that if anyone accepts the inauguration invitation, “I hope that the check they get is in the nine figures. Because it’s probably the last check they’re ever going to get.” Renshaw’s got a point. Based on the current offer, I’m out—though I would take seven figures if that super popular 80s cover band The Reagan Years suddenly grows a conscience and joins a hippy colony in one of DC’s drained swamps.

What’s the difference, after all, between selling out for big money and selling out to a crowd addicted to the lure of outrage?

The Trump team knows how to find me.

About Brenton Dickieson

“A Pilgrim in Narnia” is a blog project in reading and talking about the work of C.S. Lewis, J.R.R. Tolkien, and the worlds they touched. As a "Faith, Fantasy, and Fiction" blog, we cover topics like children’s literature, apologetics and philosophy, myths and mythology, fantasy, theology, cultural critique, art and writing. This blog includes my thoughts as I read through Lewis and Tolkien and reflect on my own life and culture. In this sense, I am a Pilgrim in Narnia--or Middle Earth, or Fairyland. I am often peeking inside of wardrobes, looking for magic bricks in urban alleys, or rooting through yard sale boxes for old rings. If something here captures your imagination, leave a comment, “like” a post, share with your friends, or sign up to receive Narnian Pilgrim posts in your email box. Brenton Dickieson is a father, husband, friend, university lecturer, and freelance writer from Prince Edward Island, Canada. You can follow him on Twitter, @BrentonDana.
This entry was posted in Thoughtful Essays and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

16 Responses to Why I Chose not to Perform at Trump’s Inauguration

  1. virginia says:

    Whoever wrote this article doesnt know what they are talking about when saying Gene Simmons declined the inauguration. Simmons was on Fox News last week and said KISS WAS NEVER INVITED. The writers of this article and others reporting wrong info need to get their facts straight.


  2. My favourite sentence here was, “Choosing to remain in your… means negotiating a complex series of compromises…” About 15 years ago I was listening to a really good presentation on Benedictine spirituality when I realised that God was doing business with me at a very personal level. The speaker was talking about the commitments that a member of a Benedictine community is expected to make and the one that was especially speaking to me was the vow of stability. In a Benedictine sense this meant staying in one place and not wandering around always looking for something better. It created the monastery in the western world. I thought hard about commitments that I had made and asked God which were for keeps. Three came to mind:
    1) My marriage to Laura. This seemed pretty fundamental and this year we will celebrate our 25th anniversary. Of course there have been some ups and downs but I know that this is absolutely central to the best of me and will be so “till death us do part”.
    2) Some key friendships. There are certain people who I felt I needed to stick with through thick and thin. I have tried to stay true to that but even as I write this I realise that there is one that I need to give special thought to right now.
    3) The last was my ordination promises made back in 1988 and in my case that means the Anglican church & especially the Church of England. In many ways that one has been the hardest of all but I think I have found a way to doing that with integrity and feel happier than I have felt for a long time. Without going into detail it has been about being content to be a disposable item as far as the institution is concerned and to stay true to what I can give to others. And at the heart of the whole thing is to know that God never disposes any of us and I am utterly secure with him.

    It has been good to take out a few minutes to reflect on this so thanks for that. At the heart of it all on that day was a realisation that the stable heart of my life was my commitment to be true and to give my best and this has been a source of strength ever since. And of course it is different for absolutely everyone.


    • That’s a powerful vow in a culture of itchy feet, in societies where much is disposable, in families that fill every increasing sizes of homes, and in peoples that fill out every available space of earth. I used to say that when I settled down I would plant a Japanese maple. I didn’t, which says a lot of what I think about “home.”
      Thanks for this great reflection.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. joannewighton says:

    GOOD MORNING AMERICA . !!.here we go again..My morning read,..with coffee..and though not fully awake..Fully Engaged and entertained by your delightful post!..forgive my humourous feeling..!
    Like it or not, I think history, is playing out some ” weird” Song..Truthfully, my sense of Humour”, is at best, only masking a deep sense of personal nervousness.!!.
    The ” Trump ” Card, is certainly shaking things up. Thank you, Mr. Dickieson, for wading into the conversation. I feel less small and alone, in our current drama, here. GREAT VIDEO.
    Joanne in SARNIA, Ontario.. Canada..A little port on the American border..!!.


    • Waking up to Kiss shirtless will always substitute for coffee.
      And yes! Laugh away. It was meant in that spirit (though not everyone got it!).
      Perhaps the best thing we can do is laugh–though many on the front lines have a lot of work to do.
      On “Trump Card” I have a post from earlier on “Trumpery” that is also fun.

      Liked by 1 person

  4. janetawel says:

    Insightful. Also, ironic, somewhat satirical, humorous, sobering. Great piece.


  5. L.A. Smith says:

    Love your reflections here. I, too, struggle to understand why the point is of all the celebrities in the first place, but given that celebrities seem to be accepted as the norm at a Presidential inauguration, it is interesting to reflect upon the whys and why nots of attending. I appreciated your point about all the people who will be there doing a job (and thus, supporting, it seems) who no one seems to care about. There’s great fruit there for reflection on our obsession with celebrity and with the meaning we put upon their particular presence or absence. At any rate, this Canadian is quite happy to stay on the sidelines and watch the show from here.


  6. carolyn@carolyncurtis.net says:

    Brent, this is hilarious (and also deep)! It’s one of your columns where I long for a Share button so I could post it to Facebook. I only post a couple of times a month, but this would be mine for this week.


    Carolyn Curtis

    Author | Speaker



    817.479.7374 home office

    817.991.7602 mobile


  7. robstroud says:

    You’ll still be attending though, right?

    It just won’t be a legitimate inauguration without you there!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.