John Lawlor on C.S. Lewis’ “The Allegory of Love”

The Allegory of Love … is a work which has all the authority of a mind of the highest quality marking out clear paths in a complex and absorbing mass of material. As such it effortlessly joins company with that very small class of books for which a future can be confidently predicted. They are those works which handle a large subject—large not in range, merely, but in significance to the human spirit—with a pioneer’s skill, marking out new country and leaving an indelible impression for all subsequent settlement of the area. They can be wrongheaded in approach or mistaken in detail; but they must not be so much accounts of literature in the past as themselves instances of literature in being.

When Anatole France spoke of literary criticism as recording the adventures of the soul among masterpieces he doubtless had something of the sort in mind. Alas! from the ordinary output of criticism we can only conclude that there are some very dull souls about. Yet there is a rare category of works of criticism that justifies the aphorism. One thinks of Bradley’s Shakespearian Tragedy, Ker’s Epic and Romance, John Livingston Lowe’s Road to Xanadu, to name no others. Each is a book which not only shows great powers of penetration and organizing skill; each succeeds in communicating the activity of a mind of the highest quality entirely intent on the material before it, to which it is giving new and distinctive shape. Let us describe these books in one word: they are in the highest degree readable.

Lewis’s The Allegory of Love surely belongs in any such classification. There is a luminous intelligence of the first order at work—an angel who writes as only Lewis could, humorously, graphically, and with an exalted seriousness. To be sure, there are things to be disputed, in Lewis’s book as in all the others of its distinguished class. Lewis was the first to point them out…. But, as with the other works I have listed, here is a book, obedient to the first rule of writing—that on every page it asks to be read. How many extended works of literary criticism are truly unputdownable? It is the severest test; and The Allegory of Love triumphantly survives it.


From John Lawlor, C.S. Lewis: Memories and Reflections (1998). Prof. Lawlor was an undergraduate student of Lewis’ and a graduate student of J.R.R. Tolkien. This review was written near the end of his life, on the 100th anniversary of C.S. Lewis’ birth. It begins a section that describes the strengths of The Allegory of Love in detail, and puts it in the context of Lewis as a scholar who was writer worth reading. You can see my full review here. The italics in the text are original, but I added the bold highlighting and changed the paragraphing a little.

Advertisements

About Brenton Dickieson

“A Pilgrim in Narnia” is a blog project in reading and talking about the work of C.S. Lewis, J.R.R. Tolkien, and the worlds they touched. As a "Faith, Fantasy, and Fiction" blog, we cover topics like children’s literature, apologetics and philosophy, myths and mythology, fantasy, theology, cultural critique, art and writing. This blog includes my thoughts as I read through Lewis and Tolkien and reflect on my own life and culture. In this sense, I am a Pilgrim in Narnia--or Middle Earth, or Fairyland. I am often peeking inside of wardrobes, looking for magic bricks in urban alleys, or rooting through yard sale boxes for old rings. If something here captures your imagination, leave a comment, “like” a post, share with your friends, or sign up to receive Narnian Pilgrim posts in your email box. Brenton Dickieson is a father, husband, friend, university lecturer, and freelance writer from Prince Edward Island, Canada. You can follow him on Twitter, @BrentonDana.
This entry was posted in Reflections and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to John Lawlor on C.S. Lewis’ “The Allegory of Love”

  1. salooper57 says:

    Thanks for directing us to Lawlor – I’m enjoying “Memories and Reflections” very much..

    Like

  2. David Llewellyn Dodds says:

    Thanks for this fine excerpt! (Tangentially, Tolkien went on appreciating Ker’s Epic and Romance, to judge by his own unputdownable ‘Beowulf: The Monsters and the Critics’.)

    A similarly unputdownable book about early Christian art from 1949 by F.G.L. van der Meer (sadly not among those of his books translated into English) gives a vivid glint of evidence that The Allegory of Love already enjoyed a European reputation by then.

    Like

    • Thanks David. I actually have Ker’s book, but haven’t done more than skim it. I also didn’t know if Allegory of Love had any cache on the continent.
      Do you know if the “Meer” in van der Meer is like the older English “meer” for sea? I suppose it could also be from the Latin–they all seem connected, still today in French (but also in German and Dutch?).

      Like

      • David Llewellyn Dodds says:

        That would be my immediate guess, but surnames can be trickier than they look. (I happen to have just started a Dutch historical novel set in 1815, where the character-narrator is paying playful attention to the fortunes of French immigrant surnames in Dutch (including her own), not least when Dutch civil servants writing them down are involved.) By the way, a good book by F.G.L. van der Meer that did make it into English is, Augustine the Bishop (1961), which gives a vivid picture of the rest of his life, picking up where The Confessions leave off. Another interesting-looking one, which I hope to catch up with someday in one language or another, is his Apocalypse. Visions from the Book of Revelations in Western Art (1978). (I’ve only skimmed Ker, so, far, too – as attractive as it seems…!)

        Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s