Perhaps one of C.S. Lewis’ more famous—or infamous—quotations is this:
“A young man who wishes to remain a sound Atheist cannot be too careful of his reading” (Surprised by Joy, 182).
Hidden in this 20th century tweet is the idea that serious study will bring an intelligent and engaged thinker to a belief in God. The pre-Christian Lewis, however, was besieged not just by the philosophical proofs for the existence of God, but by the spiritually infused worldviews of the writers he most admired.
“All the books were beginning to turn against me. Indeed, I must have been as blind as a bat not to have seen, long before, the ludicrous contradiction between my theory of life and my actual experiences as a reader. George MacDonald had done more to me than any other writer; of course it was a pity he had that bee in his bonnet about Christianity. He was good in spite of it. Chesterton had more sense than all the other moderns put together; bating, of course, his Christianity. Johnson was one of the few authors whom I felt I could trust utterly; curiously enough, he had the same kink. Spenser and Milton by a strange coincidence had it too. Even among ancient authors the same paradox was to be found. The most religious (Plato, Aeschylus, Virgil) were clearly those on whom I could really feed.” (Surprised by Joy, 201-202).
The chief offender was George MacDonald, the 19th century preacher and writer of faerie tales. In Surprised by Joy (1955), Lewis shares the moment of his first encounter with MacDonald, when he was 18, just before WWI:
“Turning to the bookstall, I picked out an Everyman in a dirty jacket, Phantastes, a Faerie Romance, George MacDonald. Then the train came in. I can still remember the voice of the porter calling out the village names Saxon and sweet as a nut—‘Bookham, Effingham, Horsley train.’ That evening I began to read my new book.
“The woodland journeyings in that story, the ghostly enemies, the ladies both good and evil, were close enough to my habitual imagery to lure me on without the perception of a change. It is as if I were carried sleeping across the frontier, or as if I had died in the old country and could never remember how I came alive in the new” (170-171).
I’ve posted the March 7, 1916 letter to his boyhood friend, Arthur Greeves, Lewis’ teenage version of the same moment. He tells much the same story of discovering “another author to add to our circle” in a “rather tired Everyman copy”:
“Have you read it? I suppose not, for if you had, you could not have helped telling me about it. At any rate, whatever the book you are reading now, you simply MUST get this at once.”
Lewis stayed with MacDonald through his 20s. On January 11, 1923, he writes in his diary:
“After this I read Macdonald’s Phantastes over my tea, which I have read many times and which I really believe fills for me the place of a devotional book. It tuned me up to a higher pitch and delighted me.”
The spell continues. On Aug 7, 1918, he says to Arthur, “In my present mood few things have pleased me more than Macdonald’s ‘The Goblin and the Princess.’” In a period of great uncertainty and financial pressure, Lewis “yielded to a long-treasured desire” and ordered 
MacDonald’s Lilith (Aug 19, 1925), which he later re-read when he was feeling down (June 25, 1926). His letters are filled with joyous moments—where the phrase, “I read another MacDonald,” is a clue to a correspondent that his time is well spent.
I have read both The Princess and the Goblin (1872) and The Princess and the Curdie (1883), and loved them both. Recently, I read through Phantastes for the first time, and except for the Cosmo Story-Within-a-Story, I am sad to say that I was not mystified by MacDonald’s Faerie Romance. It was a good story, but was not, for me, the threshold of the region of awe as it clearly was for Lewis.
But for Lewis, in any case, the siege was successful. The spell worked its way upon the victim in the end. By the close of the 1920s, Lewis had reluctantly accepted the idea of a God. As he worked through the 
implications of his theism and considered the case for Christianity, it is natural that he turned to George MacDonald, the one who carried him across the frontier in the first place. He connected the idea of conversion with death, linking St. Paul’s idea in Galatians and Romans with MacDonald’s idea. Indicative of this Emmaus Road reconsideration of MacDonald’s works is Lewis’ letter to Arthur on Sep 1, 1933:
“I have just re-read Lilith and am much clearer about the meaning.”
The letters of the 1930s—we have no journal from this period—are filled with references to MacDonald as Lewis is drawn deeper and deeper into the Christian story. And when he becomes a public figure, it is George MacDonald who is so frequently recommended in his correspondence. 
One of these letter friends, Mary Neylan, also became a Christian. Years later when C.S. Lewis created an anthology of MacDonald’s works, he dedicated it to Mary Neylan, who “got more out of him than anyone else to whom I introduced his books” (May 20, 1945).
Classically, Lewis wrote this of his first encounter with MacDonald: “That night my imagination was, in a certain sense, baptized; the rest of me, not unnaturally, took longer” (Surprised by Joy 172).” It is not insignificant to note, though, how he finishes the chapter entitled “Check” in his spiritual autobiography:
“I had not the faintest notion what I had let myself in for by buying Phantastes” (Surprised by Joy 172).
Atheists really must be more careful in their reading.
MacDonald, my favorite “chief offender.”
I Love CS Lewis but I love George Macdonald much more. I first came to read GM when I was 8 years old but didn’t discover his adult books till I was about 20. I understand what CS Lewis meant when he said his imagination was baptised when he read Phantastes. I feel the same. I don’t think there has ever been a faery (as distinct from fairy) story like Phantastes or Lillith. Happy to add that I met my husband through our mutual love of George Macdonald.
Wow–a faery romance! Cool story. I’m slowly exploring MacDonald, and loved the Princess books.
I’ve just downloaded the complete works of George Macdonald on Kindle and was wondering which 3 of his works I should read first? Many thanks from South Africa.
Great question. If you like fantasy books, I would go like this:
1. Princess & Goblin
2. Princess & Curdie
3. Phatastes
4. Lillith
5. Back of the North Wind
If your interest is more about thought, philosophy, theology, then I would also read through Unspoken Sermons over time.
Hi Ryan! That’s a hard one. If you prefer fantasies, than maybe start with one of his more tamed ones like The Light Princess or The Golden Key or The Wise Woman or The Princess and the Goblin (which is a children’s book) or perhaps Adela Cathcart since that is a period novel containing a bunch of short stories being told. To me his greatest works are Lilith and Phantastes which I would save for last. I would love to hear how you get on with them!
Well done.
Reading MacDonald is like being baptized into another world, and often learning along the way what is truest in this one. Lilith’s clenched fist or Adam and Eve’s house shed images where preaching may not go easily.
That was quite nicely put.
Pingback: Telling it Slant: The Problem With Writing Conversions | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: The Heart of C.S. Lewis’ Spiritual Legacy | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: 2013 End of Year Book Survey | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Reblogged this on jkinak04.
The only MacDonald that I have read is Phantastes and it did not really work for me. Is there anything that you would recommend as a starter?
Me neither. I liked the Cosmo story a lot though. Perhaps I had expected too much.
I loved the Princess books (+ Goblin & + Curdie)–both fun fairy tales. Next in line for most readers are Lilith and Back of the North Wind.
Pingback: An Incredible List of Faerie Books (by author J. Aleksandr Wootton) | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: Reading George MacDonald: Introductions | Kerry's loft
Pingback: Really Recommended Posts 3/14/14- “Cosmos,” The Monuments Men, C.S. Lewis, and more! | J.W. Wartick -"Always Have a Reason"
Pingback: An Incredible List of Faerie Books (by J. Aleksandr Wootton) | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: Adventures in Lewisiana | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: Another Awesome Day at The Wade | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: Different Kinds of Reading, Different Kinds of Books | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: Writing Process Blog Hop! (#WritingWednesdays) | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: C.S. Lewis Really Should Have Seen it Coming: More On the Dangers of Reading | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Lovely. It was George MacDonald my husband was quoting the first time I heard him speak, and I turned to my sister and said, “I’m going to marry that man.”
What a great note! I must say, that doesn’t happen every day.
Thank you, Brenton! In my case, once in a lifetime – over 40 years ago, now.
Hi Susan, thanks for the note. I was thinking of you the other day. I hope the writing is going well!
Pingback: The Meadow Mouse Story: A Postmodern Fairy Tale | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: Cataloging the Wade: An update from Elaine Hooker | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: Simon Vance’s Reading of “The Great Divorce” (an Audiobook Review) | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Reblogged this on The Wise Imagination.
Pingback: 2014: A Year of Reading | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: Why is Merlin in That Hideous Strength? | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: What I’m Reading Wednesday | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: “You’re one of me too”: Venn Diagram Friends by Neil Gaiman and C.S. Lewis | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: The Place of the Lion in C.S. Lewis’ Fiction | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: ‘Arch-natural Psalms’: The Poetry of The Great Divorce (Guest Post by David Llewellyn Dodds) | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: On a Picture by Chirico: A Controversial Suggestion about the Creation of Narnia | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: On Pretending to be in a PhD (pt. 2) | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: A Scary Story-Within-A-Story by John Crowley #trickortreat | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: 2015: A Year in Books | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: The Top 12 Posts of All Time | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: Unbottleable!? | Road Report
Pingback: Yatta! Chronological Reading of C.S. Lewis Complete | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: Why I Read C.S. Lewis Chronologically | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: How You Can Read C.S. Lewis Chronologically | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: The Stories before the Hobbit: Tolkien Intertextuality, or the Sources behind his Diamond Waistcoat | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: Losing the Safety of the Real in That Hideous Strength | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: 2016: My Year in Books: The Infographic | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: 2016: A Year of Reading | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: Approaching “The Silmarillion” for the First Time | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: Stephen King and the Genre of Genius | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: William Morris’ Nonsense from Nowhere | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: Did that Lizard Just Turn Into a Horse? Guest Post by Josiah Peterson | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: The End of Science and Beginning of Faith | Navigating by Faith
Pingback: Leatherhead and Literary Coincidence, with C.S. Lewis and H.G. Wells | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: Arthurian Literature and the Old Everyman’s Library, by Dale Nelson | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: C.S. Lewis’ Teenage Bookshelf, and Other Lessons on Reading | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Please don’t assume atheists is a homogeneous mass that all think and feel the same. For me religion is like believing in Santa Claus or a flat world; either you do or you don’t. It’s not a choice or an opinion, it’s just the way it is. And no book can change that.
No, you are right. Not every atheist is open to intellectual exploration and the curiosity of possibilities. I was speaking here about those who don’t negate other worldviews through simplistic categories, but those for whom the intellectual pursuit is one of humble certainty critiqued in the face of evidence, experience, logic, and philosophical construct.
Any examples? And if you plan to write a blog with a comments section, perhaps insulting those who actually leave a polite reply by insinuating they are less intelligent, simplistic and narrow minded without actually knowing the person, is not the best idea.
Why would it be insulting? You said yourself that you reduce religion to belief in Santa Clause or ancient disproved science and that you aren’t interested in exploring past that. I’m generally talking to people who live in the tension of possibilities, so there is some possibility that there is a God or truth beyond the measurable universe. Those are the atheists I tend to meet and there really isn’t a need to dialogue with those who are absolutely certain (as I don’t have a lot of dialogue with, say, Mormons or Muslims or fundamentalist Christians or whoever doesn’t put their faith to the test).
It’s about believing or not beliving. In that regard, religion can be compared to other assumptions about reality. And not believing, as in being an atheist, is not about choice.
The topic here is that one can be convinced to believe in a certain religion during converstations with others or reading a book. Some may be, but far for everyone. And for those who don’t, it’s not because they are not intelligent, creative or open.
I had a discussion with a Christian once, and he failed to explain what it was all about.
(And once with a creationist who used the same old argument about apes and humans)
I agree about the intelligence bit. Atheists, doubters, agnostics, and post-religious folk are among the most important contributors to intellectual life in the last three centuries (and more recently creative endeavours too).
As far as choice goes, I’m not so sure. You are talking about 90% of people in human history–more if you think of Marxism as a religious ideology or ideology that answers the same kinds of questions (as I am tempted to). The atheist privilege to say all others choose is not universally demonstrable.
I have to wonder if you know that I am a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. I’m curious about your statement that we “Mormons” don’t put our faith to the test. We should talk. 🙂 <3
Different use of the comma! As in, I don’t have a lot of dialogue with these several groups, not these groups defined as untesting faith.
I actually used to live in Lethbridge, Alberta, which had about as many LDS as evangelicals. It is just north of Cardston, the first non-American LDS temple. Mormons were my neighbours, colleagues, and sometimes my students. Here, they are mostly bright-faced missionaries at the door!
Sorry to send that message to you.
Pingback: On the Passing of Eugene Peterson, with Gerard Manley Hopkins | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: 2018: A Year of Reading: The Nerd Bit | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: Terry Lindvall’s Heavy Treatment of a Light Topic: A Review of Surprised by Laughter | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: George Macdonald’s “The Princess and the Goblin”: The Animated Movie with a Note by ChrisC | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: 1,000,000 Hits on A Pilgrim in Narnia | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: A Life of C.S. Lewis in 20 Minutes: Videos, Timelines, and Resource Articles (Throwback Thursday) | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: Good C.S. Lewis Studies Books That Did Not Win the Mythopoeic Award: Part 4: C.S. Lewis Reception Studies | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Hello, Brenton. I wonder if you can help with a George Macdonald quote. In my reading of Elizabeth Goudge, who held Macdonald very high in her esteem, I found, amongst other moments where she mentioned Macdonald, or quoted passages from “Phantastes”, or prayers, this puzzling expression: “the secret too great to be told”.
Goudge mentions this in the Foreword to her A Book of Faith (1976). But so far I have been unable to identify which of George Macdonald’s works this comes from.
Hi Sorry, just a few weeks behind in my correspondence!
I’ve done a search but haven’t found that quotation in my files or online. Could it be a slight misquotation?
Many thanks, Brenton. I am sure this is not a misquote by Elizabeth Goudge. Since asking you, I have bought three other Goudge books (her anthologies of Peace and Faith and Prayers: I already had her anthology of Comfort) and checked all citations of George Macdonald. Unfortunately, the Diary of Prayer that cites this quote of Macdonald (pp 12, 326) lacks any source, or acknowledgement. Goudge was an old woman when she made these four anthologies, and she was not scrupulous with her sources, unfortunately. I shall have to continue digital FIND in all the Gutenberg Project texts of Macdonald (there are about fifty!). Many thanks for trying, on my behalf. John
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 10:42 AM A Pilgrim in Narnia wrote:
> Brenton Dickieson commented: “Hi Sorry, just a few weeks behind in my > correspondence! I’ve done a search but haven’t found that quotation in my > files or online. Could it be a slight misquotation?” >
Oops! The Goudge anthology was actually “A Book of Faith”, not her “Diary of Prayer”. I have sent a query to http://www.george-macdonald.com/ which claims to be the main organisation dedicated to Macdonald. Maybe they have searchable archives, or quotes. With best wishes, as always, John
Good luck with this query John!
Pingback: Sharp Novel Minds and Pithy First Lines, with Jane Austen, C.S. Lewis, J.R.R. Tolkien, Dorothy Sayers, Geo. MacDonald, G.K. Chesterton, Ray Bradbury, N.K. Jemisin, Nalo Hopkinson, Margaret Atwood and more! | A Pilgrim in Narnia