The Heavenly Horses of C. S. Lewis: A Guest Blog by Leslie Baynes

great divorceOne of the most memorable scenes in The Great Divorce, and the only one where a shade accepts grace and enters heaven, features a horse. At the end of chapter 11, the Ghost enslaved to the lizard Lust desperately desires to be free of it but just as desperately clings to his life-long companion. The only escape is a clean break—killing the beast. But little does the Ghost realize that the lizard’s death will bring them both life, transforming the man into a new being, and the rapacious reptile into a glorious new animal:

“So far from dying, the creature was still struggling and even growing bigger as it struggled. And as it grew it changed. Its hinder parts grew rounder. The tail, still flickering, became a tail of hair that flickered between huge and glossy buttocks … What stood beside me was the greatest stallion I have ever seen, silvery white but with mane and tail of gold. It was smooth and shining, rippled with swells of flesh and muscle, whinnying and stamping with its hoofs. At each stamp the land shook and trees dindled.”

The two breathe into each other’s nostrils. The man climbs on the horse’s back, and “there was riding if you like!” the narrator exclaims, as the earth rejoices and the pair gallops off together into true heaven.

This isn’t the only place horses appear in The Great Divorce. In the next vignette, Sarah Smith of Golders Green is accompanied by a retinue of animals, including a herd of horses. Our narrator is confused by their presence, but his guide George MacDonald explains the reason why they’re there:

“Every beast and bird that came near her had its place in her love. In her they became themselves. And now the abundance of life she has in Christ from the Father flows over into them.”

wild horses mountainsMany of Lewis’s works include animals of some kind, but equines, and especially horses, seem to hold a special place in his imaginative world. Even children reading the Chronicles of Narnia can see this, from Strawberry/Fledge in The Magician’s Nephew to the donkey, unicorn, centaur, and horses in The Last Battle (not to mention the protagonists Bree and Hwin in The Horse and His Boy!). When I was a child reading the Chronicles, Lewis’s depictions of horses were some of my favorite parts of the books. As I grew up and moved on to his work for older readers, and when I became a horse owner and equestrian myself, I started wondering about Lewis’s personal relationship with horses. Did he ever own one? If not, did he have the opportunity to ride, or at least to spend significant time with them? How did he come to write about them so accurately and sympathetically?

At some point I heard that Lewis gave his stepson Douglas Gresham a pony, and I decided to write and ask him about it. Douglas very graciously answered my questions in a delightful series of emails that we exchanged over the last few months.

The Kilns CS LewisDouglas’s “pony” was actually a small horse, what’s called a Cob, and her name was in fact Cobber. “She was solid, strong, stubborn, hard-mouthed and flighty, a real handful for a child to ride,  and I loved her. We also used her to pull a plough for our vegetable garden,” Douglas wrote. When I asked where she lived, he told me that “she had a stable (built by Fred Paxford our Man-of-all-work) at The Kilns. It was located about 50 yards straight out from the back door.” His step-father “liked the horse and often fed her titbits of this and that.” Douglas had her for about four years, but when his attention turned to motorbikes, she was sold, although he owned and worked with many other horses later in his life, and he remains a great horse lover to this day.

The other significant memory that Douglas has regarding his stepfather and horses is the horror he felt about their deaths on the battlefields of World War I, which he had seen firsthand as a combatant. Millions of horses were conscripted into the fighting, and few of them made it out alive. Their story has been told most famously in the book, Broadway play, and movie War Horse.

Lewis’s love of horses appears in his letters, and they supply some background illuminating how he turns them into such potent images in his books. For instance, when he learns that his dear friend Arthur Greeves has taken up riding, he writes

“The news of your learning to ride was surprising, amusing (as you foresaw!) and on the whole good … What would attract me the most about riding, viz. the unity of man and beast, is, I suppose, largely spoiled by having to use hired horses. But if you find you like it I suppose you could easily afford a horse of your own … Certainly I should enjoy very much strolling round with you to visit it in its stable.” (November 5, 1933)

We don’t know what happened with Arthur’s riding lessons, but we do know that the anticipation Lewis voices in the last sentence of the letter was fulfilled in his enjoyment of visiting Cobber with Douglas decades later at his own stable at The Kilns. In this letter we also see what may be the first articulation of an idea that becomes important in his books, the “unity of man and beast.” Lewis is right about that collected letters cs lewis volume 3 ed by walter hooperexperience being spoiled by “hired horses.” He knows that horses are not motorbikes or even livestock. As the horse-human relationship grows and deepens over time, so does the quality, and thus the enjoyment, of the rides they share together. In a letter to Sarah Neyland, Lewis writes,

“I particularly envy you having half a pony and learning to ride. I can’t, but I love the sight and sound and smell and feel of a horse and v. much wish that I could. I’d sooner have a nice, thickset, steady-going cob that knew me & that I knew how to ride than all the cars and private planes in the world.” (January 16, 1954)

These letters set the stage for how he uses the archetype of the horse in his writings, with the union and harmony of horse and rider being central to his purpose. The purest mythological expression of this idea is the centaur, which appears not only in his fantasies like the Chronicles of Narnia, but other places, too, e.g., the book Miracles. This book is very much concerned with the relationship between God and the physical world, or Nature. When Lewis uses equine imagery, it almost always represents Nature in some form, and often the human body, as it does in Miracles chapter 14. He writes there,

“The spirit was once not a garrison, maintaining its post with difficulty in a hostile Nature, but was fully ‘at home’ with its organism, like a king in his own country or a rider on his own horse—or better still, as the human part of a Centaur was ‘at home’ with the equine part.”

Remember the Ghost and the lizard in the Great Divorce: the two of them were at war, but the new man and his heavenly mount became a perfect union. After he watches the pair wild horses on the plaingallop away, the narrator writes that the earth sang because “the Nature or Arch-nature of that land rejoiced to have been once more ridden, and therefore consummated, in the person of the horse.”

Such language might make some modern readers uncomfortable. It’s hierarchical and thus completely out of fashion. But as Lewis himself would say, the question of whether or not it’s in fashion is not the same question as whether or not it’s true. From a practical horsemanship standpoint, it’s a truism. Horses live in herds with distinct hierarchies, and each animal knows his or her own place, with the lead mare at the top, and every horse’s position assigned in descending order from there.

When you take a horse out of the herd, the rider has to become the lead mare, taking total control of her mount. If that doesn’t happen, things become very dangerous very quickly because the horse is anxious, uncertain, and afraid. If the horse is allowed to be in charge in that emotional state, both people and horses will suffer. In the same way, we humans must be in control of our natures, our appetites, from our sexual lives to how we spend money, because if we aren’t their masters, we will surely be their slaves, or, to return to an equine metaphor, get bucked off and find ourselves face down in the dirt.

cs lewis the great divorce awesome coverFull mastery of the unruly horses of our nature is impossible in this lifetime, so we look forward to perfectly lovely rides in the resurrection. Lewis’s harmonious horses can only be heavenly horses. Consciously or unconsciously, in describing them he draws upon thousands of years of precedent from the Bible and the Greco-Roman classics that he knew and loved so well. In those texts earthly equines appear most often in the context of war, but all of the cultures that ringed the Mediterranean also had a tradition of divine horses. For example, the biblical prophet Elijah is carried to heaven in a chariot drawn by fiery heavenly horses. William Blake alludes to this story from 2 Kings in his poem Jerusalem (which, set to music, has become almost a British anthem):

Bring me my bow of burning gold!
Bring me my arrows of desire!
Bring me my spear! O clouds, unfold!
Bring me my chariot of fire!

In the Book of Revelation, the resurrected Jesus returns to earth riding a white horse, accompanied by an army of angels similarly mounted. The color is significant. The Ghost-Become-New-Man’s horse in The Great Divorce was also “silvery white.” White horses were prized in the Mediterranean world, and they were especially associated with kings and royalty. According to the Roman writer Virgil, white was the color of victory, so it isn’t surprising that victorious generals rode, or were pulled in chariots by, white horses when they celebrated their triumphs, the ancient equivalent of ticker-tape parades honoring the returning heroes. White horses were also closely associated with the gods, which may be why that color of horse was the equine sacrificial offering of choice.

Jewish Catacomb Vigna Randanini in Rome picture from E. R. GoodenoughAnother sort of horse Lewis and ancient authors jointly favored was the winged variety. It, too, was closely connected with the gods and with life after death. According to the Greek writer Hesiod, Pegasus flew “to the deathless gods: and he dwells in the house of Zeus and brings to wise Zeus thunder and lightning.” By virtue of his wings, Pegasus is a natural for bridging the gap between heaven and earth. He becomes a psychopomp, a creature who leads the soul to heaven. Even some ancient Jews adopted this use of the symbol, if we may judge from the two pegasi that decorate the Jewish Catacomb Vigna Randanini in Rome (picture from E. R. Goodenough).

Of course, in his writings Lewis didn’t represent the winged horse simply as the soul’s guide. Christians reject a Platonic dualism of soul and body. How could they be dualistic about them, given Christ’s own resurrection? Lewis’s winged horses serve to illustrate the idea, as he wrote in Mere Christianity, that

“God became man to turn creatures into sons: not simply to produce better men of the old kind but to produce a new kind of man. It is not like teaching a horse to jump better and better but like turning a horse into a winged creature … it is not mere improvement but Transformation.”

miraclesEastern Orthodox Christians call this transformation of humanity into the image of God theosis. One step along the way to that blessed state is an attempt to deny the baser aspects of human nature through fasting and abstinence, especially during the season of Lent. Those Christians, Orthodox or not, who are keeping Lent and looking forward to Easter might find this final paragraph in Miracles on heavenly horses to be good spiritual food for the remainder of the journey:

“To shrink back from all that can be called Nature into negative spirituality is as if we ran away from horses instead of learning to ride. There is in our present pilgrim condition plenty of room (more room than most of us like) for abstinence and renunciation and mortifying our natural desire. But behind all asceticism the thought should be, ‘Who will trust us with the true wealth if we cannot be trusted even with the wealth that perishes?’ Who will trust me with a spiritual body if I cannot control even an earthly body? These small and perishable bodies we now have were given to us as ponies are given to schoolboys. We must learn to manage: not that we may some day be free of horses altogether but that some day we may ride bare-back, confident and rejoicing, those greater mounts, those winged shining and world-shaking horses which perhaps even now expect us with impatience, pawing and snorting in the King’s stables. Not that the gallop would be of any value unless it were a gallop with the King; but how else—since He has retained His own charger—should we accompany Him?”


“The Heavenly Horses of C. S. Lewis” is part of a Monday series on The Great Divorce here on A Pilgrim in Narnia.

Guest blogger Leslie Baynes is associate professor of New Testament and Second Temple Judaism at Missouri State University. She rides a spunky bay Arabian named Romeo. Though not a winged horse, Romeo likes to pretend that he is.

What is your experience with horses, or horses in literature? Feel free to share in the comments below!

© Leslie Baynes, Missouri State University

Advertisements

About Brenton Dickieson

“A Pilgrim in Narnia” is a blog project in reading and talking about the work of C.S. Lewis, J.R.R. Tolkien, and the worlds they touched. As a "Faith, Fantasy, and Fiction" blog, we cover topics like children’s literature, apologetics and philosophy, myths and mythology, fantasy, theology, cultural critique, art and writing. This blog includes my thoughts as I read through Lewis and Tolkien and reflect on my own life and culture. In this sense, I am a Pilgrim in Narnia--or Middle Earth, or Fairyland. I am often peeking inside of wardrobes, looking for magic bricks in urban alleys, or rooting through yard sale boxes for old rings. If something here captures your imagination, leave a comment, “like” a post, share with your friends, or sign up to receive Narnian Pilgrim posts in your email box. Brenton Dickieson is a father, husband, friend, university lecturer, and freelance writer from Prince Edward Island, Canada. You can follow him on Twitter, @BrentonDana.
This entry was posted in Reflections and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

20 Responses to The Heavenly Horses of C. S. Lewis: A Guest Blog by Leslie Baynes

  1. Tom Campbell says:

    Lewis mentions horses (of a sort) in one other vignette in the Divorce. It was the incident of the female ghost and the unicorns. It has never been clear to me exactly what the woman’s besetting sin was. Clearly she is extremely self conscious of her appearance. She compares herself unfavorably with the bright spirits or “solid ones.” She seems not to know the spirit who speaks to her, but even this is not completely clear. We can infer from her appearance to Lewis that she was well dressed and perhaps vain. Her mortification at being seen by the spirits is obvious. She also acknowledges that the spirits are mostly naked but in an edenic “naked but not ashamed” sense. But surely personal vanity is not such a mortal sin as to keep her from heaven. The one word used by the bright spirit that gives us some clue is “shame.” But what was she ashamed of? It is not clear. Apparently shame clung to beyond reason insulates one against redemption. For a moment she hesitates and seems to be close to acceptance of grace, but then she rejects it.

    What is more mysterious occurs at this point. The bright spirit summons a “blessing” of unicorns. Why unicorns? The unicorn symbolizes different things in different cultures, but for Lewis the medieval meaning of the unicorn would probably have been determinative. Here the unicorn symbolizes purity and its horn could purify poisoned water. It can represent wild freedom and virtue. And ultimately it represents Christ.

    Perhaps the women had had some deeply shaming experience which turned her inward and now she could speak and think of nothing but herself. The unicorns were the only entities that could remove her shame and bring purity back to her soul.

    We will never know; Lewis did not witness the end of that story.

    Like

    • When we use the word “sin”–or in my context, anyway–we tend to use it to identify an action or stream of actions. In one of St. Paul’s contexts, make up and elaborate dress was sinful; most modern Christians have decided make up and pretty clothes aren’t sinful.
      But this woman is not lost in sin because she is doing sin, necessarily, but because she is lost in self. I wonder if she is simply meant to be frightened or jarred in to forgetting self for a moment, and if she forgets herself just for a moment, she may see eternity forever.
      But why unicorns? I don’t know. They are mythic, but also phallic. They are about the most surprising thing one can see on, say, a Tuesday evening. Perhaps I’m missing something.

      Like

  2. Don Johnson says:

    My first experience with a pony was one I don’t remember, but I have the black and white photo of me (age 3 or 4) sitting on the back of a roving photographer’s pony in our (city) front yard dressed in fringed vest, chaps and cowboy hat. When I was 6, the family moved to a farm and my Dad bought a young Tennessee Walking Horse. When the seller delivered the horse (Dixie), Dad immediately lifted me onto her bare back before removing the halter and putting on a bridle. Dixie got spooked and took off at a gallop with me hanging on to her mane, but when she got to the end of the field, we parted company as she went right and I kept going into the wire fence. We later became fast friends and I hated to see her sold about the time I learned to drive..

    Like

    • Great story. I never had horses growing up. They were viewed as luxuries. Instead, I spent my time reading The Black Stallion books, Black Beauty (what TS Eliot called “an Anglican horse”), that Brighy of Grand Canyon book, watching Phar Lap as my first theatre movie, and sketching horses until I had their heads right.
      One year we hosted Clydesdales on our farm. I remember their mountain feet thundering on turf, and the bright steam from their nostrils on cold days.

      Like

  3. robstroud says:

    Fascinating. And so very informative. The most moving passage in Lewis’ work relating to horses combines many of the elements addressed here, including the horrors of the WWI battlefield. It comes from The Last Battle.

    “With a thunder of hoofs, with tossing heads, widened nostrils, and waving manes, over a score of Talking Horses of Narnia came charging up the hill… Poggin the Dwarf and the children opened their mouths to cheer but that cheer never came. Suddenly the air was full of the sound of twanging bow-strings and hissing arrows. It was the Dwarfs who were shooting and—for a moment Jill could hardly believe her eyes—they were shooting the Horses. Dwarfs are deadly archers. Horse after Horse rolled over. Not one of those noble Beasts ever reached the King.”

    Like

    • I struggled with that part of the Last Battle–I struggled reading it to the 7 year old. I almost think a more garish battle on screen is less effective than a quiet quote like this.

      Like

    • Leslie Baynes says:

      That scene never failed to wound me to the core.

      Like

    • David Llewellyn Dodds says:

      I had never had horses on the battlefields of World War I and Lewis’s not unlikely experience of that together in my mind before – but it does seem such experience could be a likely part of what lies behind this vivid and terrible passage. (Somewhat analogous in effect, though not in background, is the horror of killing and eating Talking Stag in chapter 9 of The Silver Chair.)

      Like

      • I sort of have a horror of the death of horses anhway. I wonder about some creatures–horses, dolphins, crows, bees, certain microbial colonies, rats–whether they are a society that I just haven’t learn to understand yet. Aliens, gods, or demons, perhaps.

        Like

        • David Llewellyn Dodds says:

          Lewis talks at different times (and in different ways) about wishing one could read things written by animals from their perspectives. I wonder if the attraction of animals (and some more readily than others) and horror at the death of animals (distinctly including horses in the War) give a firm basis for the additional horror of deliberately, callously killing Talking Animals. (Which somehow makes me think I should reread Out of the Silent Planet and the various attitudes to ‘alien species’ developed there.)

          Another thought, is the literary historical dimension to what you say, some of which must have come into the prep for Lewis’s ‘Prolegomena’ lectures, though how much he might have used (beyond what we find in OHEL and The Discarded Image) I don’t know. Things like Solomon and the ant, and attention to bee-monarchy down the ages, and inhabitants of different elements and media (earth, air, water) and their presumed societies and hierarchies, and of course the ‘Animal Kingdom’ in beast fables, etc.

          I am also reminded of what Cyrus H. Gordon writes in Adventures in the Nearest East (1957: at least in the further-revised 1959 Dutch translation) about setting up an open-air ‘clinic’ while excavating at Tell Beit Mirsim and encouraging local eye-hygiene in terms of saying the pus from infected eyes was full of djinn that caused eye-diseases in preference to trying to explain bacteriology.

          But what first sprang to mind was Madeleine L’Engle’s A Wind in the Door, for its explorations of the inhabitants of greater and littler ‘worlds within worlds’!

          Like

  4. David Llewellyn Dodds says:

    Professor Baynes,

    Thank you for such a delightful essay, full of matter for further thought!

    I wonder how horsy Lewis’s world was, at different times and places, and why he was not horsier himself in practice? Which also gets me wondering about other Inklings in a horsier everyday world than a lot of us are used to: Tolkien at nearly seven years older, Williams at twelve.

    By way of comparison, my grandmother was eight years older than Lewis, and, in the urban midwest, rode a pony in her youth; thirty years later, suburbanly, my mother saw groceries delivered or hawked from horse-drawn wagons, and, I think, my parents went riding on holiday, before I was born (while I only delighted in the tame horseback rides at fairs, amusement parks, etc., as a boy).

    Both your essay and Tom Campbell’s comment get me wondering about more possible Williams-Lewis ‘intertextual interaction’ in The Great Divorce: the unicorn vignette with Williams’s striking (though not uncreepy) “Taliessin’s Song of the Unicorn” in Taliessin through Logres, and the lizard-horse scene with The Place of the Lion more broadly and deeply. There, there is the attention (not usually worked out in detail) to the Angelicals, like the Eagle, and their corresponding spectral misperceptions or whatever, like the pterodactyl. Here, in the relation of lizard and horse, it is as if the pterodactyl gets properly transformed into the Eagle.

    One of Williams’s Angelicals is a Horse. Your wider attention to heavenly horses reminds me of Dr. Leslie S.B. MacCoull’s ” ‘A Woman Named Damaris’: Pseudo-Dionysius’ Celestial Hierarchy in The Place of the Lion”, in The Charles Williams Quarterly, No. 129 (Winter 2008), pp. 10-20, in which (p. 12) she thinks it “plain that one of Williams’s primary inspirations for his novel […] was his reading of an English translation of the Pseudo-Dionysian corpus”, hypothesizing further “that he read and drew on John Parker’s 1894 translation of the Celestial Hierarchy”, and points to the lion, eagle, and horse in chapter 15 of that work. Happily, the Rev. Mr. Parker’s translation of The Celestial and Ecclesiastical Hierarchy is available scanned in the Internet Archive in various editions, so we can easily see what Dionysius says about horses.

    What might “the Nature or Arch-nature of that land” in Lewis’s novel have to do with the Angelicals (and perhaps, too, the Garden) in Williams’s?

    Like

    • Leslie Baynes says:

      Mr. Dodds, you ask some very interesting questions and provide great food for thought! Someone could certainly do a good deal of work on the archetype of “Horse” in Williams’s literary corpus. You’ve begun that work yourself rather brilliantly.

      Thank you, too, for the reference to Dr. MacCoull’s article, of which I was not aware. I look forward to reading it.

      Liked by 1 person

      • David Llewellyn Dodds says:

        Thank you! I think there is also a version of Dr. MacCoull’s article in Charles Williams and His Contemporaries, edited by Suzanne Bray and Richard Sturch, but (idiotically enough, given my interests) I have never had a copy of that in my hands, and do not know whether Dr. MacCoull’s article is identical in both publications, or if the book version is revised from the Quarterly one (in any case, it is fascinating!).

        Like

  5. Pingback: Web Round Up #8 | Women Biblical Scholars

  6. Pingback: The Deeper Meaning of “The Great Divorce” | A Pilgrim in Narnia

  7. Pingback: ‘Arch-natural Psalms’: The Poetry of The Great Divorce (Guest Post by David Llewellyn Dodds) | A Pilgrim in Narnia

  8. Pingback: A Cheeky Poem about Talking Beasts by C.S. Lewis | A Pilgrim in Narnia

  9. Pingback: On a Picture by Chirico: A Controversial Suggestion about the Creation of Narnia | A Pilgrim in Narnia

  10. Pingback: 2015: A Year in Books | A Pilgrim in Narnia

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s