John Lawlor’s Memories and Reflections on C.S. Lewis

I have just had the delightful experience of reading John Lawlor’s book, C.S. Lewis: Memories and Reflections (1998). Prof. Lawlor was an undergraduate student of C.S. Lewis’ before and after WWII before continuing on to do his graduate work with J.R.R. Tolkien. That’s a one-two punch many of us would love to take. Lawlor was a scholar of medieval and romantic literature, working in the shadow of Lewis and remaining friends until the latter’s death. Memoirs and Reflections is a tribute book, first to friendship and then to scholarship, honouring the craft of writing both in content and form.

I don’t always love memoirs of the people I study, especially when they repeat well-worn anecdotes full of wink and whimsy. With Lawlor it is entirely different. Instead of the same old stories, we have a fresh insider look at Oxonian life at the time when Lewis was at the peak of his work as a public intellectual. The memoirs are funny, evocative, and intentionally controversial. Lawlor wants to cast himself as an outsider-insider, an arrogant student slowly won over by the awe-inspiring presence of an unmatched thinker and writer of this day. Yet it is not merely hagiographical; Lawlor sheds light on Lewis’ weaknesses as well as his strengths. Above all, the book is not cute. There is enough pretentiousness and wit for me to read it with a posh BBC accent (in my mind).

The four essays that make up the “reflections” cover the Ransom Cycle, Narnia, the theme of reason and romanticism, and Lewis as writer and scholar (or, perhaps, writer-scholar). The first essay on the Ransom Cycle is a robust and integrative summary without a true critical thesis. And it is all the better for it, taking on the tone of a senior scholar as he invites readers into a literary conversation as broad as his own. There are no footnotes, as if we are expected to have Owen Barfield or Jonathan Swift at hand to look up the full references. This essay and the one on Narnia are pieces I would send back to the senior undergraduate because they don’t provide enough links to the text. As the culmination of a lifetime of reading Lewis, though, they are marvelous reading.

The only difficult essay in the book is the one that is by far the best. In the piece where Lawlor treats Lewis as scholar and writer, he spends a great deal of time in The Allegory of Love and Lewis’ other literary historical and critical works. It is a breathtaking chapter that, when combined with the postscript, cuts to the heart of Lewis’ spirituality and integrates it with his work as literary scholar and popular writer.

Memories and Reflections is written for a very particular kind of reader. Unlike so many books about Lewis that bring the reader through burnt-over biographical lands, Lawlor expects that you know Lewis’ story pretty well and have a good sense of his work. Memories and Reflections is for the reader who loves (or hates) Lewis’ fiction and has been dabbling in the more literary work. Once you have read Alan Jacobs’ The Narnian (2005) or George Sayers’ Jack (1988), John Lawlor’s book is a great next step into just Lewis’ world and the worlds he created. It would be good to have read The Allegory of Love (1936) or The Discarded Image (1964), but the essays are worthwhile even if you are new to those great, accessible histories of medieval stories.

Honestly, I am quite surprised that I don’t hear more about this book. Harry Lee Poe and Rebecca Whitten Poe recommend it in C.S. Lewis Remembered (2006). Some biographers refer to Lawlor, including Alister McGrath, Alan Jacobs, and Joel Heck (including his book on education). This book is included in the bibliographies and in a smattering of papers, as is his Patterns of Love and Courtesy: Essays in Memory of C. S. Lewis (1966)—meant as a retirement gift to Lewis but offered instead as a memorial volume. You can also read an essay on his experience as Lewis student in Jock Gibb’s Light on C.S. Lewis (1965), or in Lawlor’s lifetime of writings on the transformation of the university and medieval literature.

I would be inclined to challenge Prof. Lawlor on some of his readings. His gregarious use of commas to hold together gargantuan sentences is not in my taste. His use of the semicolon should be outlawed. All in all, though, Memories and Reflections is an evocative and creative look at Lewis and his work from one of his early disciples. I recommend it for readers of Lewis wanted to move beyond introductory material.

Advertisements

About Brenton Dickieson

“A Pilgrim in Narnia” is a blog project in reading and talking about the work of C.S. Lewis, J.R.R. Tolkien, and the worlds they touched. As a "Faith, Fantasy, and Fiction" blog, we cover topics like children’s literature, apologetics and philosophy, myths and mythology, fantasy, theology, cultural critique, art and writing. This blog includes my thoughts as I read through Lewis and Tolkien and reflect on my own life and culture. In this sense, I am a Pilgrim in Narnia--or Middle Earth, or Fairyland. I am often peeking inside of wardrobes, looking for magic bricks in urban alleys, or rooting through yard sale boxes for old rings. If something here captures your imagination, leave a comment, “like” a post, share with your friends, or sign up to receive Narnian Pilgrim posts in your email box. Brenton Dickieson is a father, husband, friend, university lecturer, and freelance writer from Prince Edward Island, Canada. You can follow him on Twitter, @BrentonDana.
This entry was posted in Reflections and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to John Lawlor’s Memories and Reflections on C.S. Lewis

  1. Pingback: OPSS2.COM 역삼건마 오피쓰 역삼오피

  2. Dana Ames says:

    “Above all, the book is not cute.”
    Recommendation enough for me… I will see if I can locate a copy on ABEbooks. I have too many new books not yet read to buy another new one 🙂 At my age, the phrase “Too many books, not enough time” becomes meaningful…

    Dana

    Like

    • Thanks Dana. Perhaps wait to bump into this one. I think (I can’t remember) I got it for $5 at a book stall when I spent $20 or something. There may be a few out in the community somewhere that you’ll bump into one just as you need it?

      Like

  3. Joe R. Christopher says:

    I haven’t re-read Lawlor’s book since it came out, but your comment about no footnotes raised a vague memory. The press that published it published a book by Jim Como about the same time–and both had no footnotes. I felt at the time that both books sounded as if they had had footnotes to back up points, but an editor (I surmised) thought footnotes or endnotes turned readers off and so eliminated them. I may have been wrong, but I had a strong intuitive hunch at the time. I gather you didn’t react that way.

    Like

    • I don’t know, Joe. I haven’t read Como’s book, but have seen it. I love footnotes, and would love to have a couple of the Barfield ones. But the claims are never outrageous. I wouldn’t let a young student write this way, that’s all.

      Like

  4. Roger White says:

    Readers may be interested to learn that John Lawlor also put together a collection of essays in honor of the retirement of Inklings member, Nevill Coghill. “To Nevill Coghill from Friends” was published by Faber and Faber in 1966 with W. H. Auden serving as co-editor of the volume.

    Like

  5. David Llewellyn Dodds says:

    Delightful to think that that essay in Light on C.S. Lewis got followed up on this scale, decades later! (If I registered the existence of this, I was not paying enough attention – but it probably slipped past me altogether, in the domestically busy and library-lacking late 1990s: thank you for this – it makes me keen to catch up!)

    Like

  6. tphillman says:

    Thanks for the interesting review, Brent. The book is now on my at best asymptotic reading list. Your remarks on his punctuation remind me of something we say at my shop about visits from the district manager: if all she can criticize is how dusty the shop is, we must be doing a good job.

    Like

    • David Llewellyn Dodds says:

      I love a good dusting of punctuation – bring on the semi-colons (learning the Wrong Things from Charles Williams?).

      Like

  7. Pingback: John Lawlor on C.S. Lewis’ “The Allegory of Love” | A Pilgrim in Narnia

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s