Well, the time has come. Last Thursday, just after noon, I submitted my thesis for a PhD in theology and literature at the University of Chester. I spent the Friday cleaning my digital and actual desk–a task with a few days more ahead–and the weekend with family. But I wanted to take a brief moment to celebrate and share with you why I have been sequestered away for these last few months.
The thesis is titled:
“The Great Story on Which the Plot Turns”:
Cruciformity in C.S. Lewis’ Narrative Spiritual Theology
I include the abstract below. I argue that there is an image that was central to C.S. Lewis’ conversion, and that image orients his entire thought process about life. The image is death and resurrection, patterned in the cross as a way that we are to live. When we refocus our lens of reading Lewis upon his vision of spiritual life–rather than, specifically, Lewis as apologist or critic or whatever party people want to align him with–we can see this image not just in his Christian teaching, but in the heart of his fiction and even his approach to literary theory and cultural criticism. It is this idea, I believe, that integrates all of Lewis’ thought.
I will spend the next three months preparing to defend this thesis, and at some point it will be a book–either in a dissertation series, or rewritten for more popular audiences. We will see!
- 73 months since I first registered, though I began “pretending” I was in a PhD in August 2011, which was 2,884 days ago; that means I will have been at this for 8 years when I defend
- 110,269 words including bibliography and front matter; 99,969 words of body text
- 279 pages at A4/1.5 space; 348 pages at 8.5×11/2 space
- 1,334 footnotes; 445 bibliographic entries–92 of which are C.S. Lewis’ materials
- 6 chapters (I didn’t count the sections) made up of 2,579 paragraphs
I will wait until I actually pass the PhD before I share the full dedication, but I wanted to say that I included you readers in my brief dedication. I really have used this blog to test out my ideas, knowing that if I haven’t clarified my ideas in writing them, the audience of book fans, scholars, and students who read this blog would work on my blunt edges. I mention some of the senior scholars in Inklings studies who have reached out to me personally for support, but also this “strange” blog that I write. Some of my colleagues have looked at part or all of the thesis, and I thank them, but then I note some people–some of you–who have read parts or all the thesis:
“the online forum at A Pilgrim in Narnia, which I have used as a thesis sandbox over the years. Others in that community have also read portions or all of this thesis, including David, Yvonne, and Dana—who revealed all of my typographical oddities.”
Thanks so much, folks, for your strong reading and thinking.
I have found it increasingly difficult over the last seven months to multitask–as I have always done well in the past. In the last three months, I have failed to keep up with comment conversations and the many places this blog has been shared in digital forums. At one point, I grew quite impatient and left a conversation in our comment section; other times I am told I sounded grumpy: what were happy and short comments from me, unfortunately came out as brusque or dismissive (I tried to fix the ones I recognized as such, but my apologies to others whom I’m sure I’ve missed). I’ve realized that I have also come to loathe public controversy, and found myself worrying at night about this space. I used to relish in the classroom and dinner table spaces of battle and friendship, but when I can’t see people’s eyeballs I now know that I don’t love it. This experience will shape my writing, I think.
I suspect that this blog space will still be pretty speculative and playful over the summer and early part of the fall term–including some lessons learned from this process. But I think it will settle in again to more familiar patterns. I hope to have a Narnia series in Winter 2020, another L.M. Montgomery series in Spring 2020, and later that year something about a book.
The thesis has six chapters. I’ve included the Table of Contents below, and I probably should have split the conclusion, but here’s the outline:
- Introduction: Cruciform Spirituality in the Works of C.S. Lewis
- Where the Secret of Secrets Lies Hid: C.S. Lewis as Spiritual Theologian
- “Die Before You Die”: C.S. Lewis’ Logic of Cruciformity
- The Shape of Cruciformity: Narrative Patterns of the Cross in Lewis’ Fiction and Nonfiction
- The Long Shadow of the Cross and the Cruciform Heroic in C.S. Lewis
- Conclusion: The Inversive Shape of C.S. Lewis’ Theology of the Cross
This thesis presses in on C.S. Lewis’ extremely diverse corpus to explore his integrative narrative spirituality of the cross. Chapter one argues that attention to the concept of spiritual self-death and resurrection in Lewis is lacking critical treatment despite the spirituality of the cross that I argue is deeply woven into the fabric of Lewis’ poetry, fiction, nonfiction, and letters. This cross-shaped spirituality, what Michael Gorman calls “cruciformity,” is central to Lewis’ understanding of Christian life. Though neglected because of reductive readings of Lewis as an apologist, chapter one surveys occasional notes about this death-and-resurrection motif in Lewis scholarship and provides definitions for methodological approaches to the study. Following definitions of spiritual theology by Eugene Peterson, chapter two turns from systematic theological explorations of Lewis to consider him as a spiritual theologian, a move that is organic to his theological enterprise, his epistemology, and his fiction. Chapter three explores Gorman’s biblical-theological approach to Pauline cruciformity, arguing that there is a six-point Logic of Cruciformity in Lewis’ so-called apologetics writings that moves past and refocuses Thomas à Kempis’ Imitation of Christ. As Lewis’ spirituality is embedded in narrative form within poetry, fiction, and nonfiction, chapter four explores “The Shape of Cruciformity” in Lewis’ œuvre, using Northrop Frye’s narratology and J.R.R. Tolkien’s theory of eucatastrophe to argue that there is a comedic, U-shaped pattern of cruciform imagery in Lewis’ fiction, poetry, and nonfiction. Chapter five interrogates Lewis’ integrative, normative narrative cruciformity with feminist theological critique, provoked by Anna Fisk’s concerns about cross-shaped spiritualities in women’s experiences. A response to this problematisation reveals an inversive quality inherent to Lewis’ thought that is itself U-shaped, comedic, and eucatastrophic. This thesis concludes by exploring this inversive U-shaped thinking central to Lewis’ theological project, arguing that the shape of cruciformity in Lewis is the shape of his spiritual theology. I conclude with “sacred paradoxes” in Lewis’ thought that invite further work and deepen our understanding of Lewis’ concept of spiritual life, thus inviting a prophetic self-critique for Christian believers.
Table of Contents
Table of Contents iii
Ch. 1: Introduction: Cruciform Spirituality in the Works of C.S. Lewis 1
Introduction: Accounting for the Integrative Nature of C.S. Lewis’ Thought 1
Definitions as Methodological Approaches 7
Death is at the Root of the Whole Matter 16
“The Macdonald Conception of Death” 20
A Brief Survey of Lewis’ Theology of the Cross 27
Ch. 2: Where the Secret of Secrets Lies Hid: C.S. Lewis as Spiritual Theologian 34
An Approach to Spiritual Theology: Eugene Peterson and “Living, living fully and well” 34
C.S. Lewis as Spiritual Theologian 38
Secondary Literature on Lewis and Spirituality 39
Social Thought and a Spirituality of the Cross in Conversation 42
A Tilt of the Head: From Systematic to Spiritual Theology 51
The Great Divorce: Eschatology to Spirituality 53
Lewis’ “Meditation in a Toolshed” as Epistemology 56
Mere Christianity: Lewis’ Emphasis on the Spiritual Life 57
An Experiment in Narnia: From Atonement Theory to Spiritual Theology 64
C.S. Lewis and The Cross Event 64
Aslanic Sacrifice as Imitation Motif 69
Ch. 3: “Die Before You Die”: C.S. Lewis’ Logic of Cruciformity 77
Michael Gorman as Conversation Partner for C.S. Lewis 77
C.S. Lewis’ Logic of Cruciformity 80
Mere Christianity: Incarnational Necessity and the Echo of God 80
The Problem of Pain: Lewis’ Six Point Logic of Cruciformity 82
Cruciformity in Lewis’ Fiction 89
The Great Divorce (1944-45) 90
The Voyage of the Dawn Treader (1952) 93
Till We Have Faces (1956) 98
Conclusion: Clarifying and Moving Past Thomas à Kempis’ Imitation of Christ 104
Ch. 4: The Shape of Cruciformity: Narrative Patterns of the Cross in Lewis’ Fiction and Nonfiction 107
Introduction: Recognisable Narrative Patterns of Spirituality 107
Lewis as Imagistic Mythmaker: “It All Began with a Picture” 108
Lewis’ Imagistic Story-making and Frye’s U-Shaped Pattern 111
Dive: U-Shaped Cruciform Imagery in Lewis’ Life and Writing 114
The Fairy Tale Form in Lewis’ Fiction 121
Eucatastrophe and Fairy Tale 121
The Pilgrim’s Regress 124
That Hideous Strength 128
Descent and Ascent in Planetary Journeys 136
Death Restored to the Baptised Imagination 141
Conclusion: The Zenith of the Cosmic Story 150
Ch. 5: The Long Shadow of the Cross and the Cruciform Heroic in C.S. Lewis 155
Introduction: A Black and Scarlet Cord: Violence and Death in the Shadowlands 155
The Long Shadow of the Cross: A Feminist Critique of Crucicentric Spirituality 160
Approaches to Feminist Christologies 160
Anna Fisk and Images of the Cross 164
Kath Filmer and the First Generation of Critics on Lewis and Women 170
Mary Stewart Van Leeuwen and the Second Generation of Lewis Gender Critics 178
Integrative Cruciformity and Inversive Qualities in Lewis’ Life and Work 183
Ann Loades and Lewis’ Christological Inversion 183
Inversive Cruciform Elements in The Four Loves and A Grief Observed 184
The Cruciform Principle and A Severe Mercy 187
Lewis’ Deepening Cruciform Inversion of Hierarchy in Love 192
Monika Hilder and the Lewisian Spiritual “Feminine” Heroic 194
Lewis as Conversation Partner in a Cruciform Spirituality of Sex and Gender 199
Ch. 6: Conclusion: The Inversive Shape of C.S. Lewis’ Theology of the Cross 202
Introduction: The Shape of Lewis’ Spiritual Theology 202
Comedy, Satire, and Ironic Inversion in Lewis’ Work 204
The Screwtape Letters as Moral Inversion 208
Comedy and Inversive Thinking 213
“As High as My Spirit, As Small as My Stature”: C.S. Lewis’ Theology of the Small 214
Criticism as Conversion: Active Surrender in C.S. Lewis’ Spiritual Theology 224
C.S. Lewis’ Experiment in Criticism 226
On A Grief Observed 229
Sacred Paradoxes: Limitations and Invitations to Further Work 232
C.S. Lewis Bibliography 243
Secondary Source Bibliography 247
Primary Sources and Archival Material 271
Congratulations! Having watched (and edited) as my husband and both our adult children took this path, I know how much time and heartache make up a doctoral thesis. You should be so proud.
Thanks so much!
Congratulations and well done! I defended last year and am just waiting for my final corrections to be approved – hopefully in the next day or two. I remember feeling quite disorientated for a few days after I submitted – my brain took a little while to adjust to the idea that I didn’t have to be thinking about skin and statistics 24/7 any more. It’s such a long haul, but it’s so worth it once it’s done! Will your thesis be deposited online anywhere? There are several sections I would be really interested in reading.
Yes, a little off still. I have a lot of work to do, but I feel good overall.
I don’t think about “skin and statistics” a lot, myself, but there will be edits for months to come!
Congrats, Professor! That is so wonderful – what an achievement! I was disappointed when I heard the Signum was only to be 30 pages – I wanted something more like a book length being the research nut and scribe that I am. This sounds like an interesting thesis! 🙂
Namarie, God bless, Anne Marie 🙂
Thanks Anne Marie, yes, the MA thesis is meant to be a much more compact and precise research piece, where you make a single argument based on scholarship. Of course, you can make that anything you want after!
Namarie to you Urendi Malendil!
LikeLiked by 1 person
So many congratulations! That’s truly an amazing and wonderful moment, and I’m so glad to hear of it.
Hannah (Interim Associate Director, InterVarsity Emerging Scholars Network)
Stellar! I’m so very interested in your work. I’ve got no academic cred behind my name, but for the wonder of minds- people who share and cause thinking deeply – I am most grateful. I can not wait to read this. All the very best Brenton. Joy and rest and much Love in the days ahead
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Karen! Hopefully I’ll survive until this becomes a book!
Hurrah! Congratulations – well done! Best wishes for the rest of cleaning your digital and actual desk, and preparing to defend this thesis (whew)! Your multitasking is always amazing!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Amazing… or overly-complicated.
Congratulations! I just finished the first year of my PhD and am beginning to understand how much work the thesis/dissertation is. It looks like a fascinating topic and I’m looking forward to hearing more about it in the future. I’m sure it must feel great to be done.
Oh, good luck with your project! It is infinitely complex, but discipline can make it a finite project.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks! I’m in a U.S. program, so I still have a couple of years of classes/exams before I get to the writing portion. I find the whole process infinitely fascinating, however.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s about time!
Seriously, congratulations, brother.
Really happy for you, and hope you will turn it into a popular book (and leave in the bits about atonement theology that had to be edited out for lack of space).
LikeLiked by 1 person
Congratulations Brenton! A huge accomplishment and well-understandable if keeping up with blog comments was a challenge at times. Best of luck in the viva preparation and getting back some semblance of a normal life… sounds like you have a few small things lined up to fill the gap this leaves behind
Congrats this is a huge accomplishment! Hey I’m trying to get in touch with you because I’m working on my second book on creativity and faith. I’m wanting to do a section on Tolkien and the criticism he faced (both external and internal). I came across your blog post about Tolkien’s self-doubt and would love to interview you to learn more. You can find me on my website (www.godandhamilton.com) and you can connect with me there. Hope we can have a conversation about this!
Ah yes, you are one of the emailers I will soon get back to! Thanks!
Congratulations! There is a phenomenal amount of work involved in a PhD! Good on you for finishing it and all the best for your viva.
There is! Thanks much!
Congratulations! Inspiration for your preparations to defend it!
Congratulations! Eight years is a lot of work!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well done, mate! I hope you can take a bit of a vacation to delight in the completion of your thesis. Time to smell some roses… or apple blossoms… or go frolicking with Dryads? 🙂
Thanks! More running from zombies. Still writing papers. But a change is as good as a rest.
Looking forward to reading the book in whatever form it is published! Well done.
Congratulations! This is very exciting 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: O Foolish Writer: The Living Reality of an Author’s Work, with C.S. Lewis, Stephen King, and Ursula K. Le Guin (Throwback Thursday) | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: On the Critical Missing Piece from the Best Part of Gary Selby’s Earthy Spirituality: C. S. Lewis and Incarnational Faith | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: 2021: My Year in Books: The Infographic | A Pilgrim in Narnia
Pingback: 2022: My Year in Books: The Infographic | A Pilgrim in Narnia