Manly Reading of Girl Books: A Note on Tenderness with Sean of the South

Quite innocently, early the other morning, I woke up to a video in my Messenger inbox from Paul Ford. I am not someone who is terribly attracted to products like this, but Paul F. Ford is the author of an excellent Companion to Narnia. I don’t think I paid it much attention (beyond an appreciation for nice book design) until, after a request, Paul sent me his graduate thesis, which is particularly sensitive to C.S. Lewis’ spirituality. Knowing the care Paul showed in his research–and watching him consistently engage with intellectual generosity to Lewis fans online–I have been able to enjoy his Companion in new ways.

In any case, you may know what it’s like for someone to send you a reel without any explanation. As I have spent years shaping an “Internet of Awesome” in my algorithmic identity, I rarely get trolls or agenda pushers. A handful of my mentors and colleagues drop something to me once in a while–either funny or containing a point of connection in our thinking. We also have some family threads that end up with pretty random shorts and vids, but this randomness also results in some of my favourite new music.

This share from Paul, though, was totally new. I clicked on the video, and I immediately assumed it was a pretty well-done spoof. Honestly, in his bearded lumberjack shirt look, the guy is just too good-looking for real life! And who is “Sean of the South”?

Then … well, then I stopped and listened. I love libraries and librarians and books, and I trust Paul. So I kept listening. As it turns out, it wasn’t a parody or off-centre bit of comedy, but a heartfelt literary tribute to a particular librarian’s intervention in his young life. I don’t want to spoil the effect, but tears clouded my already early-morning bleary eyes.

So why did Paul send this to me? As far as I know, we are not in some club dedicated to admiring philosopher lumberjacks from the south. But there is a moment in the story where the librarian slips an L.M. Montgomery book into Sean’s pile of Louis L’Amour (whom I have never read, but I am told he was moderately successful as a popular writer of guys’ fiction). “This looks like a Girl Book,” the teenage Sean responds to the librarian’s nudge. “Keep an open mind,” she responds. Sean did, and went back to the librarian, confessing that it was one of the best things he had ever read.

The story continues to what most will think is the best part, but what got to me was the word he used to describe Montgomery: Tenderness.

Ever since I first played the clip, that word has just been rolling around inside of me. Tenderness. When I think of Anne of Green Gables and Emily of New Moon, I think of the singular imaginative possibilities of these two heroines. When I think of her stories, I think of atmosphere and humour. I have always said that my initial attraction to Montgomery is because of my writerly and artistic vocation, which is true. But I think this serious and cerebral Sean of the South has it right: Tenderness.

The reason I have no idea who this sensitive and savvy Sean of the South is–a fairly popular columnist named Sean Dietrich–is not just because I am not American. It is true that I am deficient in my knowledge of American storytellers beyond speculative fiction. However, I suspect that if this stylish scribbler had popped up on my screen doing anything other than playing a banjo, I would have dismissed it. I fear that I have developed a kind of allergy to certain kinds of masculinity as presented in the media, and I would have skirted past this august author.

Now, I am a bearded gardener, and the son of a bearded farmer. My father and I lumberjacked together in plaid–though I was pre-beard at the time. My allergy has never been am aversion to the idea of masculine trades or manly appearances, but some collective sense of what it means to be a guy that I have never understood. My farming father was a man’s man, no doubt–a hockey player and homebrewer driving his tractor home in the setting sun kind of man. But he was always something else to me.

Though I doubt I have a full sense of this man who required a certain kind of violent ruggedness in his lifestyle, his masculinity to me was humour, storytelling, sensitive parenting, curiosity, strategy, and fierce loyalty. Though I always felt like an alien in my farming community, in my fishing-village school, in my hockey locker rooms and among the clusters of guys hanging out in school halls, it was not my father who made me feel so. He was often frustrated with my lack of common sense and attention to detail, but I never felt like he was threatened by my queer awkwardness any more than he was threatened by my mom’s powerful 1980s feminism.

In the end, my father’s physical strength was unable to save his family. As he disappeared into our burning home to rescue his youngest son, though, I never felt like he failed as a man. Whatever manliness is, I know, is found in that moment, a cruciform shadow in the doorway, taking a breath before laying it all down. That’s the idea of manness in my mind–not the one on magazine covers or in locker-room talk or in other spaces that communicate clearly, “Brenton, you don’t belong here.”

And so tenderness: My child-hand in his, my unsplit skin against his hands made rough by earth and fire and wood. For all the reasons I read Girl Books, I think tenderness is an unrecognized quality I have been searching for. I have thought of sensitivity–which is why I read Narnia, Montgomery, Jane Austen, and books that no other guys I knew growing up were reading. But there may be something more, too.

I know I am unusual, and I embrace that, but I want to think more about tenderness–and I see that characteristic in Paul Ford’s scholarship–and not a few of the essayists and scholars I give my time to.

In amy vase, it’s a sweet video, and I hope you enjoy it–and find a characteristic in reading that goes beyond our often limited imaginations of boys and girls and the books they write and read.

Note, this song came on when I was writing this, The Tragically Hip’s “The Luxury” came on, with quite a strikingly opposite of manliness and tenderness than I’ve been talking about here:

Posted in Reflections | Tagged , , , , | 4 Comments

Why is Anne in Space? On Reading L.M. Montgomery’s Realistic Novels as Fantasy

Right now, I am prepping for a conference panel tomorrow that I announced last week: “Cinderella Anne, Paranormal Emily, and Astral Heroines Everywhere: L.M. Montgomery and the Fantastic.” I’m working with with three fantastic scholars (see what I did there?): Heidi Lawrence and Trinna Frever (past MaudCast guests–watch for Heidi in season 3), and Abigail Heiniger (whom I’m meeting for the first time). You can see more about that below, including how to register for the VICFA online conference.

Meanwhile, I want to use a bit of pushback I received to talk about what I’m doing in my larger project of reading Prince Edward Island‘s beloved Lucy Maud Montgomery. While most of the feedback is positive and curious, I have received two kinds of resistance from this panel announcement and in previous online classes in Signum University’s SPACE program.

First, since Montgomery is presented to us as a solidly realistic imaginative writer, there is a focused concern about genre. Second, there is a more intuitive concern about whether these kinds of enterprises honour Montgomery’s gift to us.

I confess that playing with the iconography of Anne of Green Gables has some risks–whether in a lightly steampunk space capsule or on the edge of fairyland (or so I meant to evoke). I don’t know how to respond to this kind of argument, exactly, but I hope, in answering the first challenge, I can show the degree to which I seek to honour Montgomery’s life work.

First things first: am I bending genre definitions too far to think about the fantastic when I’m reading Montgomery?

I’ll start with a question: Where do you find Montgomery at your local independent bookstore? Here in PEI, she gets her own section, but I doubt that is the case in many places beyond our magical island. Often enough, I find some of her novels in Children’s Books, or there may be a ragtag collection of her works in Canadian Literature. Increasingly, though, I find Montgomery in the “Classics” section–and not without reason. Anne of Green Gables is undoubtedly a classic.

When it comes to classification by age group, region, or status (what else is a Classics section?), it gets a little awkward. She is a children’s writer, but what about The Blue Castle, a decidedly adult book with adult themes? Most of the long-form fiction is set in PEI, but Montgomery published writings from and about Saskatchewan, Nova Scotia, and Ontario–including Jane of Lantern Hill, a brilliant but late and less-recognized work that begins and ends in Toronto. Jane is a classic to me, but not to the general public. What about The Watchman, and Other Poems, one of the few collections of her relatively unknown poetry? Or what about Montgomery’s journals–nearly 50 years of life writing in print and available? Or her 500+ published short stories?

As a follower of Ursula K. Le Guin, I am perhaps too quick to be dismissive of genre. After all, Montgomery was a very intelligent businesswoman and selected her markets carefully. Still, Montgomery, like Le Guin, had her work narrowed and dismissed because of genre categories. In both cases, some of that dismissiveness was gender-based, with Le Guin being panned as “soft SciFi” and Montgomery as “just a girl’s writer.” The times moved on during Le Guin’s career, but a generation of Montgomery scholarship was lost to the literary gatekeeping of the label makers in the industry and academy.

Plus, you may have noticed, I’m not Montgomery’s primary reader. Should I only shop in women’s fiction now because I like Emily of New Moon?

Elizabeth R. Epperly has written one of my favourite works of literary criticism, The Fragrance of Sweet-grass. Part of what Epperly is doing is reading Montgomery as a romantic writer. It is a slippery definition, “romantic,” but in Montgomery’s time, it had a broad set of categories.

Much later, in the early 1930s, C.S. Lewis provides seven potential definitions without coming to stories of falling in love (see the Preface to the 3rd edition of Pilgrim’s Regress). When Lewis began writing science fiction and fantasy on the eve of WWII, he was writing “interplanetary romances.” There is some kinship in the worlds of romance–and behind all of them are George MacDonald, the Arthuriad, and the fairy tale traditions.

Beyond this, though, scholars and artists have been colouring outside the lines that are drawn around Montgomery’s writings, which limit as much as they help. Here is Epperly’s proposal:

“perhaps we can separate Montgomery’s confinements by genre and expectations from her liberations of imagination and perception to see how romance is, ultimately, the power we give to the visions we endorse” (Elizabeth R. Epperly, The Fragrance of Sweet-grass, 250).

When we push against genre boundaries and read the text, there are some intriguing aspects of Montgomery’s storytelling that go beyond strict realism. Besides miracles in various stories and an abiding sense of Providence in certain of the novels–is God fantastic or realistic in our world today?–there are little elements of the fantastic. Some of my favourite tales have hints of enchantment, bewitchery, faërie, dreams and visions, ghosts and the supernatural, the prophetic, other ways of seeing and knowing (like second sight), and moments of the deeply improbable, if not impossible.

The fantastic plays along the edges of the imaginative worlds Montgomery builds–and sometimes much closer to the centre.

Moreover, within the frame of the story itself, the characters (and sometimes the audience) have emotional experiences bound up with the uncertainty about what is true–or even something like hope or stubborn belief in the fantastic. We know as readers that Anne and Diana have peopled their woods with imaginary ghosts, but the uncanny elements cannot be so easily dismissed in the Emily stories. In the Story Girl’s world, we do not know if wanderers and wise women can really be witches. If we simply dismiss the possibility as readers, we narrow the scope of Montgomery’s imaginative vision.

I agree that Montgomery is not a writer of genre fantasy as we see it developed in the 20th century in the vein of Tolkien, Lewis, or Le Guin. I’m not trying to make a claim about the books themselves–at least not initially.

Rather, by considering fantastic elements in Montgomery’s realistic fiction–by sort of switching the bookshelf tags around a little bit–I’m adapting a certain line of sight into the books. I am the kind of lit scholar and critic who does not just have a single way of reading a story or poem. Instead, I use all the tools in my reading toolkit to live within the world of the story as see what I can see. Sometimes I ask about boys and girls and gender or reflect on power or write as a theologian of culture. In this particular reading, I am doing things like this:

  • I study the fictional worlds (speculative universes) that Montgomery built to find what meaning is contained in the fabric of the worlds themselves.
  • I play with Fantasy Mapping, particularly with effects of time and space in Avonlea.
  • I glance into Montgomery’s pictures of Faërie to see what it means artistically, relationally, and spiritually.
  • I wonder about Farah Mendlesohn’s 4 types of fantasy–portal/quest, immersive, intrusive, and liminal–and use her framework to ask questions about certain writing choices Montgomery made.
  • I think about what it means that my geographical space in Prince Edward Island is largely defined by a world that is not–as the skeptics say–“real.”
  • I ask readers the simple question, “What makes Anne magical?” It’s a wonder what people tell me.

Would Montgomery have put Anne is space? I doubt that kind of fiction would have interested her–though she was curious about modern inventions and spent a part of her time considering the heavens. But, coincidentally, I am reading Samantha Harvey’s Orbital, and I can’t help wondering if a dreamy eleven-year-old Anne in 1969 would have looked up to the sky when she heard about the moon landing on the radio.

I am simply conducting a personal reading experiment. Experiments may fail, after all. Not every glimpse of phantasmes and fairies in her stories is otherworldly. Still, when I follow the Horns of Elfland in Montgomery’s work, I tend to see something new.

And even then–even if the experiment fails–the results can be worth the time. For me, rereading Montgomery is always worth the risk. And that is the best way I know that I can honour Montgomery’s literary gift to the world: to read and reread what she wrote.

Cinderella Anne, Paranormal Emily, and Astral Heroines Everywhere: L.M. Montgomery and the Fantastic (Conference Panel Abstract)

This panel seeks to remedy a significant omission in fantasy fiction studies and L.M. Montgomery studies by exploring Montgomery’s works in a fantastical context.  Anticipated topics include Montgomery’s invocation and adaptation of fairy tales, use of the paranormal and otherworldly, depictions of magic and the magical world, and astronomical/cosmological themes in her work.

Session will include short, informal presentations from each scholar discussing their work in this field, moderator questions and panel discussion designed to illuminate the topic(s), and at least thirty minutes of audience Q & A to conclude the session. We hope you can attend!

Register here: https://iaftfita.wildapricot.org/event-6255095 

All of this is part of the Virtual Conference of the Fantastic in the Arts (VICFA). To attend the panel, you need to register for the conference, but the entry bar is low: $10 for students/unfunded scholars and $30-$40 for funded scholars and those who can afford it.

Posted in Fictional Worlds, L.M. Montgomery, News & Links | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

Cinderella Anne, Paranormal Emily, and Astral Heroines Everywhere: L.M. Montgomery and the Fantastic (Virtual Conference Panel Wed, Sept 17, 8:00-9:30am ET)

Hello dear readers, here is a kind of Pilgrim in Narnia crossover moment: a panel on L.M. Montgomery and the Fantastic. Drs. Heidi Lawrence, Abigail Heiniger, Trinna Frever, and I are gathering in deep cyberspace to approach this topic from a few different angles. Here is the programme description:

Cinderella Anne, Paranormal Emily, and Astral Heroines Everywhere: L.M. Montgomery and the Fantastic (Conference Panel)

This panel seeks to remedy a significant omission in fantasy fiction studies and L.M. Montgomery studies by exploring Montgomery’s works in a fantastical context.  Anticipated topics include Montgomery’s invocation and adaptation of fairy tales, use of the paranormal and otherworldly, depictions of magic and the magical world, and astronomical/cosmological themes in her work.

Session will include short, informal presentations from each scholar discussing their work in this field, moderator questions and panel discussion designed to illuminate the topic(s), and at least thirty minutes of audience Q & A to conclude the session. We hope you can attend!

Register here: https://iaftfita.wildapricot.org/event-6255095 

All of this is part of the Virtual Conference of the Fantastic in the Arts (VICFA). To attend the panel, you need to register for the conference, but the entry bar is low: $10 for students/unfunded scholars and $30-$40 for funded scholars and those who can afford it.

To celebrate the occasion, I played a bit on Canva … and got carried away. Here are two variations of the poster, so feel free to share the one you love best!

Posted in Fictional Worlds, L.M. Montgomery, News & Links | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Kate Scarth and The Life and Works of L.M. Montgomery (Super Great Courses Series)

As I talked about last week, I have been greatly enriched in my learning by podcasts, lectures, and entire courses. I keep playing with these media myself, but it was listening to Kate Scarth’s “The Life and Works of L.M. Montgomery” that made me decide to launch The Super Great Courses Series so I could share some of my discoveries with others.

First, a caveat.

As is the case with much of the content in this series, I am a friend and colleague of the author. We are the founding producers of the MaudCast, and we work together at the University of Prince Edward Island (UPEI). In academic circles, such a lack of objectivity can feel sketchy—though in those circles, we wouldn’t call it “sketchy,” but a faux pas, an indiscretion, an impropriety; it is louche, verboten, an outré approach to scholarship, a solecism on the grammar of academic diction.

While I think blind peer review has its place, if I were to describe this “objective” approach to reviewing materials, I would use a less-than-academic synonym of balderdash. Besides the value of sympathetic reading and listening, why would I spend the time writing up a review on Prof. Daüghnée VonMacSploitergroitson’s mediocre and nonconsequential course on “Wild Water Buffalo Husbandry on the Post-Soviet Steppes”?

When I have such limited audio bandwidth in the space between my ears, why would I even finish listening to such a thing if it wasn’t awesome?

Thus, I will only invest my time listening to and writing about moving and brilliant lectureships and courses. This is why I call the series “The Super Great Courses” and not “Milquetoast Musings on the Mediocre” or “Pensées on Pusillanimous Pedagogical Projects.”

And the truth is this: Kate Scarth is world-class. Besides being on the MaudCast masthead, Kate is the Chair of L.M. Montgomery Studies at UPEI, where she is also a prof in our Applied Communications, Leadership, and Culture program. She edits the Journal of L.M. Montgomery Studies, has a forthcoming monograph on Jane Austen, and … well, she does all the things.

The first lecture of this six-part series uses Montgomery’s legacy to draw us into the intrigue and depth of her life and works. I was part of a faculty team getting a 20-minute preview of this lecture in a campus classroom on a relaxed Friday afternoon. And I saw the 2-minute version of this lecture as part of a panel of dignitaries on an incredibly windy day in front of the Anne of Green Gables Heritage House, where Kate enthralled a crowd in suits and summer dresses, sipping raspberry cordial after being prepared for greatness by Canada’s Deputy Prime Minister.

I also read these lectures in draft form, but already Kate had shaped them so well that I had little I could add. I will come to the content in a moment, but I want you to hear Kate’s voice to capture the essence of what is happening here. I cannot seem to share an Audible preview, but here I am chatting with Kate in an early lockdown interview on the MaudCast:

And here is a little on-campus minidoc, where Kate introduces us to Montgomery’s Charlottetown:

What we get with Kate’s class on “Maud” is the best of literary biography delivered with intimacy and, indeed, humour. Kate is one of those speakers who, once you realize they are smiling as they speak, you can find the inside of everything they have to say. Read this description and you will see that Kate Scarth’s “The Life and Works of LMM” is a worthy addition to the Super Great Courses Series on A Pilgrim in Narnia (even if you don’t have a raspberry cordial right at hand).

Kate Scarth, “The Life and Works of L.M. Montgomery” (The Great Courses, 2025)

Canadian author L. M. Montgomery is best known for her best-selling and beloved novel Anne of Green Gables. But Montgomery was a prolific writer and artist whose output extends well beyond this long-lived masterpiece. Montgomery published 20 novels in her lifetime. She wrote hundreds of short stories and poems and 10 volumes of handwritten journals. Through her work, she has introduced readers around the world to the places she loved and to a host of unforgettable characters. Her books—especially the Emily of New Moon series, which focuses on a young writer—have inspired many other aspiring writers, including some of today’s most successful novelists. How did Montgomery make artistic magic through her writing, and how does she continue to touch so many readers across time, place, and culture?

In the six lectures of The Life and Works of L. M. Montgomery, you’ll join Kate Scarth to delve into five key topics that illuminate the life, work, and legacy of the author sometimes called “the Jane Austen of Canada”: family, place, friendship, creativity, and literature. Through these lectures, you’ll explore the impact of Montgomery’s personal experience on her art and get a clearer picture of how life both shapes and is shaped by literature. You’ll examine why Montgomery’s novels mattered in her own time and better understand the lasting and international influence of her life and her work across the generations. And you’ll discover why readers still can’t get enough of Anne, Emily, Valancy, and, of course, Lucy Maud Montgomery herself.

The Life and Works of L.M. Montgomery” is part of the Great Courses series, available on Audible.

Posted in Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , | 3 Comments

The Super Great Courses Series on A Pilgrim In Narnia

Long before the explosion of podcasting, I had fallen in love with audio lectures. Perhaps this habit began when I was taking Regent College classes by J.I. Packer, Rikk Watts, Iain Provan, and Eugene Peterson while housesitting in a log cabin on a Japanese mountainside. Listening to those tapes, CDs, and MP3 classes–it was an age of digital transition–taught me a skill that I’ve taught but haven’t really written about: pre-listening. When I finally made it to my grad school campus, I had developed the ability to find and listen to audio content that would prepare me for the material we were studying that term. Regent has a huge library of audio content going back decades, so I could find a lecture or a panel that helped me get the vocabulary and outlines of a lesson by immersion, so to speak.

Now in the streaming era, we are embarrassed by the riches of fine audio content. Since that time, I don’t know how many thousands of hours of podcasts, lectures, and entire courses I have enjoyed.

I have even played with the medium myself. I have developed video lecture-based courses on “The Fiction and Fantasy of C.S. Lewis” (The King’s College, New York), “C.S. Lewis and the Mythologies of Love and Sex” (Signum University), “World Religions” (Maritime Christian College), “Japanese Religion and Culture” (UPEI), and “Spirituality in the Writings of L.M. Montgomery” (Atlantic School of Theology). This last Montgomery project was an online Maymester course that AST offered as an inexpensive learning experience for their students, alumni, supporters, and other curious readers. More than 80 people signed up to learn about Montgomery and the Spiritual Life.

I have also been teaching in Signum’s SPACE program, where eager learners buy tokens to take 4-week online lectures and discussions in small groups. So far, I have offered “Ink Spots and Tea Stains: What We Learn from C.S. Lewis’s Writing Habits” and “Reading Anne of Green Gables as Fantasy.” I am kicking around the idea of doing a “Reading Narnia with Brenton” series on SPACE, tackling one book a month (so I’d love your feedback).

My YouTube channel has also been a place to play with content. In 2014, I did a series of shorts on “Why Religion Matters” live on location in various parts of the UK. I talked about the history of Monasticism from a monastery in Belgium and the Christian roots of the University in an Oxford library. Even then, I knew these were pretty amateur. However, sometimes people find these things helpful, like my “Christian History in One Hour: A Video Lecture,” which has been used in some church and school curricula.

I am still using video as an extension of the classroom. Just last year, I did some “student tips” videos, including the super popular “Top 10 Test-Taking Tips” and the nearly ignored (but better, I think) “Some Uncommon Common Sense about Student Debt.”

In terms of being a public scholar, I am nearly ready to launch Season 3 of the MaudCast, where I host discussions about the life, works, and legacy of Lucy Maud Montgomery. I have used A Pilgrim in Narnia and my YouTube channel not just as a teaching tool, but for provocation (see “The Real Order to Read Narnia,” for example) and as a sandbox. When doing a conference presentation, I will sometimes practice and release my presentation (like here and here), or try to work out a concept inspired by classroom conversations, like my startling claim that “The Internet is Somewhere.”

I’ve done a few 10 Minute Book Talks (10MBT), usually focusing on a single book (like the very popular videos on A Canticle for Leibowitz and Out of the Silent Planet) but sometimes going a bit broader, like “5 C.S. Lewis Biographies for 5 Seasons.”

What surprises me most about the response to my online teaching, though, is a lecture that has gained over 3,000 views: “A Grief Observed: A Talk on the Anniversary of My Parents’ Deaths, with C.S. Lewis.” It really is a lecture, with slides and pauses for sips of coffee and a super-long title. There are no dynamic YouTube design features. It’s just me talking. While I cannot usually tell how people are responding on the other side of the microphone, it is encouraging to see the comments and feedback about what has helped others.

Earlier this week, I began listening to a new “Great Course,” “The Life and Works of L.M. Montgomery” by Kate Scarth, which I purchased from Audible. As I was listening, I thought, “This is just too good to keep to myself.” The feeling grew inside of me as I heard about Sørina Higgins’ new course, “Myth & Meaning through the Wardrobe“–this just a couple of years after her own contribution to the Great Courses catalogue with “C.S. Lewis: Writer, Scholar, Seeker.” I want others to have the opportunities I have had to experience these dynamic modes of lifelong learning.

Thus, I am beginning The Super Great Courses Series on A Pilgrim in Narnia!

I will post some notes on some of my favourite courses and lecture series–not just the official “Great Courses” company ones, but everything I feel fits into my “Super Great Courses” experiences. Besides Kate Scarth’s new project, I would like to share about courses and lecture series by Dimitra Fimi, Harold Bloom, Willie James Jennings, Sørina Higgins, Raphael Shargel, Anne Curzan, Paul Fry, Michael Ward, Tom Shippey, John McWhorter, Bruce Hindmarsh, Verilyn Flieger, Jorge Luis Borges, Charles Taylor, Lyle Dorsett, Michael Drout, and (unsurprisingly) C.S. Lewis and J.R.R. Tolkien. Don’t touch that dial!

Posted in News & Links, Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment