Tolkien Studies Projects Sweep the Mythopoeic Scholarship Award Shortlist in Inklings Studies (Trying Not To Say “I Told You So”)

I just spent the weekend at Mythcon–a short, digital version of the normally weird and wonderful long weekend of scholarship and fan fun. Many of the parts of Mythcon that I love were still featured, including thoughtful and engaging panels, longer feature paper sessions to work out more complex ideas, and a bright and eclectic symposium of true lovers of imaginative literature and film. It was at Mythcon where I have met so many life-long nerd friends–and where I first launched my archival work that suggests that Lewis conceived of The Screwtape Letters as a part of the same fantasy universe as The Ransom Cycle (see here). I really love this community.

And I enjoyed the mini-con–though for this particular conference, I long to be there in person. Just as Mythcon has a tendency to encourage its participants to dust off dusty lyres and return again to fallow manuscripts when they return home, one never thinks the same again about the game of golf after Mythcon.

Honestly, I was just pleased to be able to connect at all. At this year’s online mini-conference there was a good deal of buzz about the Mythopoeic Awards. With four categories of awards (Adult lit, Children’s lit, and a Scholarship Award each for Inklings Studies and Myth and Fantasy Studies), and with five finalists in each category, the Mythopoeic Awards have a tendency to fill my TBR pile to overflowing–especially as it was a very strong slate of finalists.

While the fantasy awards are great, it’s the scholarship awards that I’m always paying attention to, especially in the Inklings Studies category (whose shortlist will, one day, contain a book with my name on the cover). Past winners include many of the scholars that we have mentioned here, including Clyde KilbyWalter HooperKathryn LindskoogHumphrey Carpenter, Paul Ford, Tom Shippey, Peter Schakel, Joe Christopher, Christopher Tolkien, Doug Anderson, George SayerCharles HuttarDavid DowningVerlyn Flieger, Michael Drout, John Garth, Janet Brennan Croft, Diana GlyerDimitra FimiMichael Ward, and Grevel Lindop, with his recent biography of Charles Williams.

Lately, these awards have been pretty hot.

In 2018, I had a chapter in a book edited by Sørina Higgins, The Inklings and King Arthur, which won the Mythopoeic Scholarship Award in Inklings Studies–shockingly edging out Jane Chance’s resourceful, Tolkien, Self and other: This Queer Creature (Palgrave Macmillan, 2016), Lisa Coutras’ pace-setting Tolkien’s Theology of Beauty: Majesty, Splendor, and Transcendence in Middle-earth (Palgrave Macmillan, 2016), and two masters in the field: Verlyn Flieger’s There Would Always Be a Fairy Tale: More Essays on Tolkien (Kent State University Press, 2017) and Christopher Tolkien’s beautifully designed and edited volume of one of his father’s greatest tales, Beren and Luthien (Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2017). In 2019, Verlyn Flieger’s book took the category, deservedly so (with respect to Catherine McIlwaine’s gorgeous exhibition book, Tolkien: Maker of Middle-earth and Jonathan S. McIntosh’s Thomistic theology of Tolkien, The Flame Imperishable). In 2019, Inklings scholar Dimitra Fimi took the fantasy award with Celtic Myth in Contemporary Children’s Fantasy: Idealization, Identity, Ideology.

Because there wasn’t a Mythcon in 2020, the 2020 finalists and winners were sort of bundled together with expectations about 2021. For the 2020 awards, it is not clear to me how they may have chosen out of these five excellent Inklings studies books:

Of that group, The Sweet and the Bitter won out, and it is a resourceful and deep study. The Fantasy Studies award category was equally strong:

Gifford won that category. My vote was for Thomas’ The Dark Fantastic–and I would place it at the top of my list of Fantasy Studies volumes of the decade–and I am enjoying C. Palmer-Patel’s structuralist study. So it pleased me to see the shortlist of awards come out this weekend and include both C. Palmer-Patel and Ebony Elizabeth Thomas for a second run:

Mythopoeic Scholarship Award in Myth & Fantasy Studies

  • The Metamorphoses of Myth in Fiction since 1960 by Kathryn Hume.
  • Gods and Robots: Myths, Machines, and Ancient Dreams of Technology by Adrienne Mayor
  • The Shape of Fantasy: Investigating the Structure of American Heroic Epic Fantasy by C. Palmer-Patel
  • The Dark Fantastic: Race and the Imagination from Harry Potter to The Hunger Games by Ebony Elizabeth Thomas
  • Fantasies of Time and Death: Dunsany, Eddison, Tolkien by Anna Vaninskaya

I have heard that Vaninshkaya’s study is great, and Kathryn Hume is always thoughtful, so we’ll see how that category goes.

But it is the Inklings Studies award shortlist that I find the most telling:

Mythopoeic Scholarship Award in Inklings Studies

  • John M. Bowers, Tolkien’s Lost Chaucer (OUP)
  • Oronzo Cilli, Tolkien’s Library: An Annotated Checklist (Luna)
  • John Garth, The Worlds of J.R.R. Tolkien: The Places That Inspired Middle-earth (Princeton UP)
  • Catherine McIlwaine, ed. Tolkien: Maker of Middle-earth (Bodleian)
  • John Rateliff, ed. A Wilderness of Dragons: Essays in Honor of Verlyn Flieger (Gabbro Head)

Five strong books with striking individual identities that also work as a collective resource kit for Tolkien scholars and fans alike.

I have never picked the winner in these photo-finish races, so I will not begin prognosticating now. I will note the link. “Inklings Studies,” narrowly conceived, includes Tolkien father and son, Charles Williams, Owen Barfield, the Lewis brothers, and a handful of more minor writers. Given the way the Inklings grew as writers and how we have grown as a fan community, we would not be surprised to find scholarly material about George MacDonald, G.K. Chesterton, Joy Davidman, or Dorothy Sayers in that list. Strikingly, though, every book on the list is a Tolkien studies volume–though the Verlyn Flieger festschrift could have included a Lewis study or two, given her lifetime of work. It did not, however, and the list stands as a testimony to the strength of recent Tolkien studies.

However, we must admit that it is not a terribly recent phenomenon. As I argued in my series, “Why is Tolkien Scholarship Stronger than Lewis Scholarship?“, Tolkien studies strength over Lewis studies–not to mention the degree to which Williams and Barfield are under-studied–goes back for some years. There are exceptions in the last decade, but they simply prove the rule–and it has been a thin decade at that.

I made a quip at the mini-Mythcon that I hope one day a Lewis studies volume would be strong enough to warrant a nomination. Historically, there have been noted Lewis studies by Doris T. Myers, Walter Hooper, Kathryn Lindskoog, Lionel Adey, Don King, Peter Schakel, Diana Pavlac Glyer, Michael Ward, Sanford Schwarts, Robert Boenig, John Bremer, and Monika Hilder, as well as good biographies by Philip Zaleski and Carol Zaleski, Alistair McGrath, Alan Jacobs, and George Sayer. So, worried that I was being overly facetious, I clarified that there were some good recent Lewis studies books, just not ones of exceptional argument, depth, or contribution to the field. It is still a tough admission to make. The publication of this award shortlist is just another confirmation that Tolkien scholarship continues to shine in ways that Lewis scholarship simply does not.

Why is this? I have offered three articles composed of a dozen reasons why I think that Lewis scholarship (as a whole) is not as strong as Tolkien scholarship (as a whole):

There is very little shade thrown on my field in those pieces, and I still struggle to fully understand the difference. I followed that up by editing a piece by Connor Salter (see “Lewis and Tolkien among American Evangelicals“), and a resource pack to make all readers into better scholars (if they want to make their field stronger: “5 Ways to Find Open Source Academic Research on C.S. Lewis, J.R.R. Tolkien, and the Inklings.” Perhaps these resources will help.

However, really the best thing I should do is write a study of C.S. Lewis that warrants a Mythopoeic scholarship award nomination. And then I have no one to blame but myself when the 2024 shortlist appears!


About Brenton Dickieson

“A Pilgrim in Narnia” is a blog project in reading and talking about the work of C.S. Lewis, J.R.R. Tolkien, and the worlds they touched. As a "Faith, Fantasy, and Fiction" blog, we cover topics like children’s literature, apologetics and philosophy, myths and mythology, fantasy, theology, cultural critique, art and writing. This blog includes my thoughts as I read through Lewis and Tolkien and reflect on my own life and culture. In this sense, I am a Pilgrim in Narnia--or Middle Earth, or Fairyland. I am often peeking inside of wardrobes, looking for magic bricks in urban alleys, or rooting through yard sale boxes for old rings. If something here captures your imagination, leave a comment, “like” a post, share with your friends, or sign up to receive Narnian Pilgrim posts in your email box. Brenton Dickieson is a father, husband, friend, university lecturer, and freelance writer from Prince Edward Island, Canada. You can follow him on Twitter, @BrentonDana.
This entry was posted in Reflections and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

25 Responses to Tolkien Studies Projects Sweep the Mythopoeic Scholarship Award Shortlist in Inklings Studies (Trying Not To Say “I Told You So”)

  1. robstroud says:

    Precisely (in relation to your final comment). Please do so, or there will most certainly be no one else to blame!

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Much as I love Lewis, I think there’s more depth in Tolkien’s work. Sorry, but there it is. So there’s more for Tolkien scholars to grapple with.

    Of course I want your book to win the 2024 award though 😀


    • Well, we’ll see on both points. I did talk about depth and breadth in one of those pieces.

      Liked by 1 person

    • David Llewellyn Dodds says:

      That is a really big difference – there are (so far as I’ve ever heard) nothing re.the Ransom cycle or Narnia n any way comparable to the body of posthumousiy-published Arda-related materials (and who knows just what still unpublished, the way Christopher sometimes talked about what he selected…).

      Liked by 2 people

  3. Diana Glyer says:

    Perhaps “A Compass for Deep Heaven: Navigating the C. S. Lewis Ransom Trilogy” will make the shortlist for next year? That, and Michael Ward’s “After Humanity: A Guide to C. S. Lewis’s ‘The Abolition of Man.”


  4. Pingback: Tolkien Studies Projects Sweep the Mythopoeic Scholarship Award Shortlist in Inklings Studies (Trying Not To Say “I Told You So”) – The Urban Fishing Pole: Cigar Blogger, Lifestyle

  5. Pingback: Tolkien Studies Projects Sweep the Mythopoeic Scholarship Award Shortlist in Inklings Studies (Trying Not To Say “I Told You So”) – Glyn Hnutu-healh: History, Alchemy, and Me

  6. David Llewellyn Dodds says:

    One response to this would be encouragement – not least by example – of more, detailed ‘inter-Inklings’ scholarship, like the attention which has been paid to the possible – indeed, likely – debts of both Lewis and Tolkien to their timely ‘discovery’ of the novels of Charles Williams, especially The Place of the Lion. (One follow-up there, would be, would we have the Planet Narnia structure Fr. Dr. Ward discerns as we have it, without The Place of the Lion?)

    I suspect a lot of such ‘inter-Inklings’ scholarship would particularly concern Tolkien and Lewis – like the attention already given to both Lewis and Tolkien’s experiences in the Great War (or even my own provocatively-titled paper about (among other things) the Father Christmas letters,’ “Tolkien’s Narnia”?’).

    Might we teasingly suggest that there would be much more of this, already, if a lot of Tolkien scholarship were less ‘ Arda-centric’? (As they say on exam papers, ‘Discuss’.)


    • David Llewellyn Dodds says:

      A worthwhile playful-serious question in that context is, how ‘Tolkienological’ and how ‘Ardalogical’ is how much Tolkien scholarship – and how attentive to Tolkien as ‘ostensible Ardologist’? The latter seems a feature of Tolkien’s creative work since the earliest days (e.g., giving Old English titles to poems – as if they were translations of hitherto unknown Old English texts?) – but how much of an extra boost may Lewis’s 1929 ‘Lay’ commentary (happily published by Christopher) have given this (already ‘bandersnatchily’ firm?) tendency?


      • It’s a good question, David. I do think there is something great in the Inklings connection–even more than has been drawn out so far. I think it is a field of great possibility, and I slowly gather the threads together in my own basket for something in the future.
        But I don’t want to be anti-that other stuff! I think we can have the one without losing the other.


  7. Steve says:

    My field is theology rather than literature, though the intersection of literature and theology is one of my interests, so I have nothing like your grasp of the field, but i wonder if there is anything comparable to Inklings Studies in other studies of 20th-century English literature. How well, for example, do Bloomsbury Studies compare to Inklings studies, in terms of number of scholars, conferences, journals etc? Their literary contemporaries generally seemed to regard them as lightweights, but the growth in Inklings Scholarship in the 21st century seems to indicate a different direction. And that is what struck me most about your article.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Hi Steve, I think of 20th c. literary figures, only T.S. Eliot has more scholarly work than Tolkien, but I don’t know the data on it. I would presume that Lewis is pretty high up there in terms of sheer number of papers and books. I still remain somewhat unsatisfied–not because the 50 best ones are good, but because I wish there were 100 best ones and of those 20 were even better.


  8. Pingback: Good C.S. Lewis Studies Books That Did Not Win the Mythopoeic Award: Part 1: C.S. Lewis on Theology, Philosophy, and Spiritual Life | A Pilgrim in Narnia

  9. Pingback: Good C.S. Lewis Studies Books That Did Not Win the Mythopoeic Award: Part 2: C.S. Lewis Biographies | A Pilgrim in Narnia

  10. Pingback: Good C.S. Lewis Studies Books That Did Not Win the Mythopoeic Award: Part 3: Literary Studies on C.S. Lewis | A Pilgrim in Narnia

  11. Pingback: Good C.S. Lewis Studies Books That Did Not Win the Mythopoeic Award: Part 4: C.S. Lewis Reception Studies | A Pilgrim in Narnia

  12. Pingback: The C.S. Lewis Studies Series: Part 5: Recent and Foundational Studies on Lewis and Gender | A Pilgrim in Narnia

  13. Pingback: The 2021 Mythopoeic Awards Winners | A Pilgrim in Narnia

  14. Pingback: The C.S. Lewis Studies Series: Where It’s Going and How You Can Contribute | A Pilgrim in Narnia

  15. Pingback: A Brace of Tolkien Posts for his 130th Birthday (#TolkienBirthdayToast) | A Pilgrim in Narnia

  16. Pingback: The Idiosopher’s Razor: The Missing Element in Metacritical Analysis of Tolkien and Lewis Scholarship | A Pilgrim in Narnia

  17. Pingback: The Literary Life in Dorothy L. Sayers’ Murder Mystery, Whose Body? (1923) | A Pilgrim in Narnia

  18. Pingback: A Brace of Tolkien Posts for his 131st Birthday (#TolkienBirthdayToast) | A Pilgrim in Narnia

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.